““Knowing something as knowledge” and “realizing” are different. You have to realize.”

— Jung Myung Seok

Extracted from Proverbs Blog https://providencepath.wordpress.com/2016/06/08/jung-myung-seok-knowing-is-different-from-realizing/

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update Sept. 11, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "“Knowing something as knowledge” and “realizing” are different. You have to realize." by Jung Myung Seok?

Jung Myung Seok 12

South Korean Leader of New Religious Movement, Poet, Author… 1945

Related quotes

“I have something to offer, and through which you can realize something, realize the essence of this life. Even if you are a billionaire, you have to have one thing going for you, and that’s life. That is a key ingredient. You don’t have life going for you, you can have everything else going for you, and it won't make any difference.”

Prem Rawat (1957) controversial spiritual leader

Washington, DC, USA, November 24, 1981
1980s

“It was one thing to accept I couldn't have Dimitri. It was something entirely different to realize someone else could.”

Richelle Mead book Frostbite

Source: Frostbite

“People say, I am afraid of changes. But who is asking you to change? Knowledge is not a change. When you see yourself in the mirror, the first thing you will realize is that beauty that you have always looked for is right there. That's the first thing you will realize. That, to me, is the magic of this Knowledge.”

Prem Rawat (1957) controversial spiritual leader

Escobar, Argentina, January 23, 1991
1990s

“One has to fill up the heart with Knowledge. The Knowledge has a form that’s called 'upadesh' (nt: sub–country; also teaching, instruction). There are many countries such as England, Germany, and India, but Knowledge is not this kind of country. This country is something different. Knowledge is the thing that when it is realized, a person becomes free.”

Prem Rawat (1957) controversial spiritual leader

Dehradun, India, December 1, 1965 (translated from Hindi)
1960s

“It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is.”

Richard Feynman (1918–1988) American theoretical physicist

volume I; lecture 4, "Conservation of Energy"; section 4-1, "What is energy?"; p. 4-2
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)
Context: It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. It is not that way.

“You know, actually we have no love — that is a terrible thing to realize.”

Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895–1986) Indian spiritual philosopher

Varanasi 5th Public Talk (28 November 1964), The Collected Works, Vol. XV
1960s
Context: You know, actually we have no love — that is a terrible thing to realize. Actually we have no love; we have sentiment; we have emotionality, sensuality, sexuality; we have remembrances of something which we have thought as love. But actually, brutally, we have no love. Because to have love means no violence, no fear, no competition, no ambition. If you had love you will never say, "This is my family." You may have a family and give them the best you can; but it will not be "your family" which is opposed to the world. If you love, if there is love, there is peace. If you loved, you would educate your child not to be a nationalist, not to have only a technical job and look after his own petty little affairs; you would have no nationality. There would be no divisions of religion, if you loved. But as these things actually exist — not theoretically, but brutally — in this ugly world, it shows that you have no love. Even the love of a mother for her child is not love. If the mother really loved her child, do you think the world would be like this? She would see that he had the right food, the right education, that he was sensitive, that he appreciated beauty, that he was not ambitious, greedy, envious. So the mother, however much she may think she loves her child, does not love the child. So we have not that love.