“People use religion, dogma, community as an excuse to justify their own intolerance, or their own phobia from something that doesn't fit into their conceived notions of gender and of identity.”

Chapter 2, Page 13 http://books.google.com/books?id=5hR_i1rNzAYC&q=%22This+is+an+era+of+specialists+each+of+whom+sees+his+own+problem+and+is+unaware+of+or+intolerant+of+the+larger+frame+into+which+it+fits%22&pg=PA13#v=onepage
Silent Spring (1962)

14 November 1878
Cosima Wagner's Diaries (1978)

"Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity" (1990)

2013, Brandenburg Gate Speech (June 2013)

Section 2
Letter to a Priest (1951)

Beautiful Minds (2010)
Context: I find that quakerism and research science fit together very, very well. In quakerism you're expected to develop your own understanding of god from your experience in the world. There isn't a creed, there isn't a dogma. There's an understanding but nothing as formal as a dogma or creed and this idea that you develop your own understanding also means that you keep redeveloping your understanding as you get more experience, and it seems to me that's very like what goes on in "the scientific method." You have a model, of a star, its an understanding, and you develop that model in the light of experiments and observations, and so in both you're expected to evolve your thinking. Nothing is static, nothing is final, everything is held provisionally.

Address at the Leadership and Diversity Conference Gatineau, Quebec, Canada (19 May 2004)