“Philistine – a word which I understand properly to denote indifference to the higher intellectual interests. The word may also be defined, however, as the name applied by prigs to the rest of their species.”
The Cornhill Magazine, vol. 33 (1876) p. 574
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Leslie Stephen 11
British author, literary critic, and first editor of the Di… 1832–1904Related quotes

As quoted in Encyclopedia of World Biography (1997) edited by Thomson Gale
Other texts
Source: Waking World, Chapter 11: Religion http://olafstapledonarchive.webs.com/wakingworld_ch11.html

“The practice of politics in the East may be defined by one word: dissimulation.”
Part 5, Chapter 10.
Books, Coningsby (1844), Contarini Fleming (1832)

A Pluralistic Universe (1909), Lecture VII
1900s
Context: Pluralism lets things really exist in the each-form or distributively. Monism thinks that the all-form or collective-unit form is the only form that is rational. The all-form allows of no taking up and dropping of connexions, for in the all the parts are essentially and eternally co-implicated. In the each-form, on the contrary, a thing may be connected by intermediary things, with a thing with which it has no immediate or essential connexion. It is thus at all times in many possible connexions which are not necessarily actualized at the moment. They depend on which actual path of intermediation it may functionally strike into: the word "or" names a genuine reality. Thus, as I speak here, I may look ahead or to the right or to the left, and in either case the intervening space and air and ether enable me to see the faces of a different portion of this audience. My being here is independent of any one set of these faces.
If the each-form be the eternal form of reality no less than it is the form of temporal appearance, we still have a coherent world, and not an incarnate incoherence, as is charged by so many absolutists.
“Why should it not be the whole function of a word to denote many things?”
Source: Philosophical Papers (1979), p. 38.