“Philistine – a word which I understand properly to denote indifference to the higher intellectual interests. The word may also be defined, however, as the name applied by prigs to the rest of their species.”

The Cornhill Magazine, vol. 33 (1876) p. 574

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Philistine – a word which I understand properly to denote indifference to the higher intellectual interests. The word m…" by Leslie Stephen?
Leslie Stephen photo
Leslie Stephen 11
British author, literary critic, and first editor of the Di… 1832–1904

Related quotes

Vladimir Nabokov photo
Benoît Mandelbrot photo
Samuel Johnson photo

“There is, I believe, something, which may be named by the misleading and debased word 'religion', and is the most distinctively human or awakened activity of man. But clearly there is something else, which is also called 'religion', and is his greatest folly and shame.”

Olaf Stapledon (1886–1950) British novelist and philosopher

Other texts
Source: Waking World, Chapter 11: Religion http://olafstapledonarchive.webs.com/wakingworld_ch11.html

Benjamin Disraeli photo

“The practice of politics in the East may be defined by one word: dissimulation.”

Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881) British Conservative politician, writer, aristocrat and Prime Minister

Part 5, Chapter 10.
Books, Coningsby (1844), Contarini Fleming (1832)

William James photo

“They depend on which actual path of intermediation it may functionally strike into: the word "or" names a genuine reality.”

William James (1842–1910) American philosopher, psychologist, and pragmatist

A Pluralistic Universe (1909), Lecture VII
1900s
Context: Pluralism lets things really exist in the each-form or distributively. Monism thinks that the all-form or collective-unit form is the only form that is rational. The all-form allows of no taking up and dropping of connexions, for in the all the parts are essentially and eternally co-implicated. In the each-form, on the contrary, a thing may be connected by intermediary things, with a thing with which it has no immediate or essential connexion. It is thus at all times in many possible connexions which are not necessarily actualized at the moment. They depend on which actual path of intermediation it may functionally strike into: the word "or" names a genuine reality. Thus, as I speak here, I may look ahead or to the right or to the left, and in either case the intervening space and air and ether enable me to see the faces of a different portion of this audience. My being here is independent of any one set of these faces.
If the each-form be the eternal form of reality no less than it is the form of temporal appearance, we still have a coherent world, and not an incarnate incoherence, as is charged by so many absolutists.

Peter Singer photo

“Why should it not be the whole function of a word to denote many things?”

J. L. Austin (1911–1960) English philosopher

Source: Philosophical Papers (1979), p. 38.

Georg Simmel photo

Related topics