
1940s, Why Socialism? (1949)
Source: 1950s, Principles of economic policy, 1958, p. 1-2
1940s, Why Socialism? (1949)
Its existence is, on the contrary, presupposed as forming what is fundamental in every one. So far as man's essential nature is concerned, nothing new is to be introduced into him. To try to do this would be as absurd as to give a dog printed writings to chew, under the idea that in this way you could put mind into it. It may happen that religion is awakened in the heart by means of philosophical knowledge, but it is not necessarily so. It is not the purpose of philosophy to edify, and quite as little is it necessary for it to make good its claims by showing in any particular case that it must produce religious feelings in the individual.
Lectures on the philosophy of religion, together with a work on the proofs of the existence of God. Translated from the 2d German ed. by E.B. Speirs, and J. Burdon Sanderson: the translation edited by E.B. Speirs. Published 1895 p. 4
Lectures on Philosophy of Religion, Volume 1 (1827)
“The end is what you want and the means is how you get it.”
Source: Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals (1971), p. 24
Simon Kuznets (1962, p. 32), as cited in: David W. Galenson, "Understanding the Creativity of Scientists and Entrepreneurs." (2012).
Source: Designing Social Systems in a Changing World (1996), p. 34-35, as cited in Alexander Laszlo and Stanley Krippner (1992) " Systems Theories: Their Origins, Foundations, and Development http://archive.syntonyquest.org/elcTree/resourcesPDFs/SystemsTheory.pdf" In: J.S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems Theories and A Priori Aspects of Perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1998. Ch. 3, pp. 47-74.
"The Poodle Gets Kicked" http://buchanan.org/blog/the-poodle-gets-kicked-3731 (March 15, 2010), Patrick J. Buchanan
2010s
Democratic Convention (19 July 2004)
“The end justifies the means. But what if there never is an end? All we have is means.”
Source: The Lathe of Heaven (1971), Chapter 6