“I don't know where my expertise is; my expertise is no disciplines. I would recommend to drop disciplinarity wherever one can. Disciplines are an outgrowth of academia. In academia you appoint somebody and then in order to give him a name he must be a historian, a physicist, a chemist, a biologist, a biophysicist; he has to have a name. Here is a human being: Joe Smith -- he suddenly has a label around the neck: biophysicist. Now he has to live up to that label and push away everything that is not biophysics; otherwise people will doubt that he is a biophysicist. If he's talking to somebody about astronomy, they will say "I don't know, you are not talking about your area of competence, you're talking about astronomy, and there is the department of astronomy, those are the people over there," and things of that sort. Disciplines are an aftereffect of the institutional situation.”

Von Foerster (1995) " Interview Heinz von Foerster http://www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/4-2/text/interviewvonf.html" S. Franchi, G. Güzeldere, and E. Minch (eds) in: Constructions of the Mind Volume 4, issue 2. 26 June 1995
1990s

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update Nov. 11, 2024. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "I don't know where my expertise is; my expertise is no disciplines. I would recommend to drop disciplinarity wherever o…" by Heinz von Foerster?
Heinz von Foerster photo
Heinz von Foerster 11
Austrian American scientist and cybernetician 1911–2002

Related quotes

Chrétien de Troyes photo

“One knows the man by the name he has.”

Chrétien de Troyes French poet and trouvère

Source: Perceval or Le Conte du Graal, Line 562

Khaled Hosseini photo
James Marsters photo
Barry Goldwater photo
Harriet Beecher Stowe photo
Paulo Coelho photo
Hilary Duff photo
Lucy Mack Smith photo
William H. Starbuck photo

“One should not label a firm as knowledge-intensive unless exceptional and valuable expertise dominates commonplace knowledge.”

William H. Starbuck (1934) American academic

Source: Learning by knowledge‐intensive firms," 1992, p. 716
Context: In deciding whether a firm is knowledge-intensive, one ought to weigh its emphasis on esoteric expertise instead of widely shared knowledge. Everybody has knowledge, most of it widely shared, but some idiosyncratic and personal. If one defines knowledge broadly to encompass what everybody knows, every firm can appear knowledge-intensive. One loses the value of focusing on a special category of firms. Similarly, every firm has some unusual expertise. To make the knowledge-intensive firm a useful category, one has to require that exceptional expertise make important contributions. One should not label a firm as knowledge-intensive unless exceptional and valuable expertise dominates commonplace knowledge.

Related topics