Toshio Shiratori (1887–1949) Japanese politician
Quoted in "World order in historical perspective" - Page 308 - by Hans Kohn - 1942.
Remarks by the President to the Diet, Tokyo, Japan. (February 18, 2002) http://www.usembassy-china.org.cn/press/release/2002/0902-gwbjapan1.html <br class="br">2000s, 2002
Toshio Shiratori (1887–1949) Japanese politician
Quoted in "World order in historical perspective" - Page 308 - by Hans Kohn - 1942.
Barack Obama (1961) 44th President of the United States of America
2011, Address on the natural and nuclear energy disasters in Japan (March 2011)
Hideki Tōjō (1884–1948) former Prime Minister of Japan and Minister of War executed in 1948
Prison journal
1940s
Clive James (1939–2019) Australian author, critic, broadcaster, poet, translator and memoirist
On the then imminent transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong from the British Empire to the People's Republic of China. From Clive James' Postcard from Hong Kong.
Television and radio
Winston S. Churchill (1874–1965) Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Telegram to FDR, March 18, 1945 http://www.churchillarchiveforschools.com/themes/the-themes/anglo-american-relations/just-how-special-was-the-special-relationship-in-the-Second-World-War-Part-2-1942-44/the-sources/source-7 <br class="br">Post-war years (1945–1955)
Mao Zedong (1893–1976) Chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China
Directives on the Cultural Revolution (1966-1972)
“Here everybody has a neighbor,
Everybody has a friend.
Everybody has a reason to begin again.”
Bruce Springsteen (1949) American singer and songwriter
"Long Walk Home"
Song lyrics, Magic (2007)
Wojciech Jaruzelski (1923–2014) Polish military officer and politician
Source: Excerpts of Martial law speech (14 December 1981)
George Friedman (1949) American businessman and political scientist
Source: The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century (2009), p. 67
Charles Evans Hughes (1862–1948) American judge
The Pathway of Peace (1923)
Context: Time has shown how illusory are alliances of great powers so far as the maintenance of peace is concerned.
In considering the use of international force to secure peace, we are again brought to the fundamental necessity of common accord. If the feasibility of such a force be conceded for the purpose of maintaining adjudications of legal right, this is only because such an adjudication would proceed upon principles commonly accepted, and thus forming part of international law, and upon the common agreement to respect the decision of an impartial tribunal in the application of such principles. This is a limited field where force is rarely needed and where the sanctions of public opinion and the demands of national honor are generally quite sufficient to bring about acquiescence in judicial awards. But in the field of conflicting national policies, and what are deemed essential interests, when the smoldering fires of old grievances have been fanned into a flame by a passionate sense of immediate injury, or the imagination of peoples is dominated by apprehension of present danger to national safety, or by what is believed to be an assault upon national honor, what force is to control the outbreak? Great powers agreeing among themselves may indeed hold small powers in check. But who will hold great powers in check when great powers disagree?.