“Pretty simple. Except for one little problem: it doesn't work!”
Paul DiLascia (1959–2008) American software developer
various
About Code
“Pretty simple. Except for one little problem: it doesn't work!”
Paul DiLascia (1959–2008) American software developer
various
About Code
Leonard Susskind (1940) American physicist
General Relativity Lecture 5, YouTube, published 30 October 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quWN1V9jOf0 (quote at 1:21:46 of 1:39:06)
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951) Austrian-British philosopher
Journal entry (24 July 1916), p. 77e
1910s, Notebooks 1914-1916
“The ethic of Reverence for Life is the ethic of Love widened into universality.”
Albert Schweitzer (1875–1965) French-German physician, theologian, musician and philosopher
Epilogue, p. 235 http://books.google.com/books?id=jHuYuLugqBAC&q=%22The+ethic+of+Reverence+for+Life+is+the+ethic+of+Love+widened+into+universality%22&pg=PA235#v=onepage <br class="br">Out of My Life and Thought : An Autobiography (1933)
C. West Churchman (1913–2004) American philosopher and systems scientist
Source: 1940s - 1950s, Theory of Experimental Inference (1948), p. 256; cited in Douglas, H.E. (2009) Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal
“Happiness is pretty simple: someone to love, something to do, something to look forward to.”
Rita Mae Brown (1944) Novelist, poet, screenwriter, activist
Source: Hiss of Death
“The real task is not to rid life of ethics but to rid ethics of its ideological content.”
John Carroll (1944) Australian professor and author
Source: Break-Out from the Crystal Palace (1974), p. 38
Barbara Jordan (1936–1996) American politician
Remarks at the University of Texas at Austin (22 February 1991), as cited in Let me tell you what I've learned https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0292787901: Texas Wisewomen Speak, PJ Pierce, University of Texas Press (2010), p. 17
J. Howard Moore (1862–1916)
We have no ethical relation to the clod, the molecule, or the scale sloughed off from our skin on the back of our hand, because the clod, the molecule, and the scale have no feeling, no soul, no anything rendering them capable of being affected by us [...] The fact that a thing is an organism, that it has organisation, has in itself no more ethical significance than the fact that it has symmetry, or redness, or weight.
Source: The New Ethics (1907), The Survival of the Strenuous, p. 169