Sarah Palin (1964) American politician
Quoting Westbrook Pegler
2008, 2008 Republican National Convention
Sarah Palin (1964) American politician
Quoting Westbrook Pegler
2008, 2008 Republican National Convention
Joseph Addison (1672–1719) politician, writer and playwright
No. 291 (2 February 1712).
The Spectator (1711–1714)
Charles Caleb Colton (1777–1832) British priest and writer
Vol. I; LXXI
Lacon (1820)
Pascual Jordan (1902–1980) German physicist and politician
In der Quantenphysik dagegen bedeutet jede Beobachtung einen Eingriff in das Beobachtete; eine Zustandsveränderung am Beobachteten ist auf Grund der quantenphysikalischen Naturgesetze mit dem Beobachtungsprozess zwangslaüfig verknüpft. Also nicht ein sowieso, unabhängig von diesem Experiment vorhandener Tatbestand wird wahrgenommen, sondern wir selber rufen die Tatbestände hervor (oder: nötigen sie in bestimmter Richtung zu einer Klärung), die dann zur Wahrnehmung gelangen.
Quantenmechanische Bemerkungen zur Biologie und Psychologie, Erkenntnis, Vol. 4 (1934). p. 228.
Lin Carter book The Wizard of Zao
Source: The Wizard of Zao (1978), Chapter 4 (p. 53)
Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895–1986) Indian spiritual philosopher
"The core of the teachings (1980) http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/about-krishnamurti/dissolution-speech.php <br class="br">1980s
Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) logician, one of the first analytic philosophers and political activist
An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (1940), Introduction, p. 15
1940s
Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895–1986) Indian spiritual philosopher
5th Public Talk Saanen (26th July 1970); also in "Fear and Pleasure", The Collected Works, Vol. X
1970s
Context: Do you decide to observe? Or do you merely observe? Do you decide and say, "I am going to observe and learn"? For then there is the question: "Who is deciding?" Is it will that says, "I must"? And when it fails, it chastises itself further and says, "I must, must, must"; in that there is conflict; therefore the state of mind that has decided to observe is not observation at all. You are walking down the road, somebody passes you by, you observe and you may say to yourself, "How ugly he is; how he smells; I wish he would not do this or that". You are aware of your responses to that passer-by, you are aware that you are judging, condemning or justifying; you are observing. You do not say, "I must not judge, I must not justify". In being aware of your responses, there is no decision at all. You see somebody who insulted you yesterday. Immediately all your hackles are up, you become nervous or anxious, you begin to dislike; be aware of your dislike, be aware of all that, do not "decide" to be aware. Observe, and in that observation there is neither the "observer" nor the "observed" — there is only observation taking place. The "observer" exists only when you accumulate in the observation; when you say, "He is my friend because he has flattered me", or, "He is not my friend, because he has said something ugly about me, or something true which I do not like." That is accumulation through observation and that accumulation is the observer. When you observe without accumulation, then there is no judgement.
George C. Homans (1910–1989) American sociologist
The Human group, 1950