“Historically inaccurate.' Adrian gestured at me with his other hand, the one not on my shoulder. "Who the hell looks at you and says 'historically inaccurate'?”

Source: The Golden Lily

Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Historically inaccurate.' Adrian gestured at me with his other hand, the one not on my shoulder. "Who the hell looks at…" by Richelle Mead?
Richelle Mead photo
Richelle Mead 816
American writer 1976

Related quotes

Michelle Obama photo

“If you don't get out there and define yourself, you'll be quickly and inaccurately defined by others”

Michelle Obama (1964) lawyer, writer, wife of Barack Obama and former First Lady of the United States
Vladimir Putin photo

“In this sense our historical, spiritual and other roots entitle me to say that basically we are one and the same people.”

Vladimir Putin (1952) President of Russia, former Prime Minister

Annual press conference, 2017-12-14
Original: И в этом смысле наши исторические, духовные и прочие корни дают мне право говорить, что в своей основе мы один народ.
Source: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/56378 http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/56378

Richelle Mead photo

“It doesn’t matter,” said Adrian, smiling. He rested a hand on my shoulder. “Some things are worth the trouble.”

Variant: It doesn't matter,” said Adrian, smiling. He rested a hand on my shoulder. “Some things are worth the trouble.
Source: The Indigo Spell

Richelle Mead photo
Virginia Woolf photo
Richelle Mead photo
Czeslaw Milosz photo

“They are totally unaware of the fact that nothing is their own, that everything is part of their historical formation — their occupations, their clothes, their gestures and expressions, their beliefs and ideas.”

The Captive Mind (1953)
Context: What is the significance of the lives of the people he passes, of the senseless bustle, the laughter, the pursuit of money, the stupid animal diversions? By using a little intelligence he can easily classify the passers-by according to type; he can guess their social status, their habits and their preoccupations. A fleeting moment reveals their childhood, manhood, and old age, and then they vanish. A purely physiological study of one particular passer-by in preference to another is meaningless. If one penetrates into the minds of these people, one discovers utter nonsense. They are totally unaware of the fact that nothing is their own, that everything is part of their historical formation — their occupations, their clothes, their gestures and expressions, their beliefs and ideas. They are the force of inertia personified, victims of the delusion that each individual exists as a self. If at least these were souls, as the Church taught, or the monads of Leibnitz! But these beliefs have perished. What remains is an aversion to an atomized vision of life, to the mentality that isolates every phenomenon, such as eating, drinking, dressing, earning money, fornicating. And what is there beyond these things? Should such a state of affairs continue? Why should it continue? Such questions are almost synonymous with what is known as hatred of the bourgeoisie.

Sam Levenson photo

“Historical, sociological, literary, linguistic, archeological and other techniques must be brought to bear when they are applicable to the material at hand.”

Cyrus H. Gordon (1908–2001) American linguist

Introduction
The Common Background of Greek and Hebrew Civilizations (1965 [1962])

Related topics