“Debunking bad science should be constant obligation of the science community, even if it takes time away from serious research or seems to be a losing battle.”

The Night Is Large (1996), Introduction to Part III, Pseudoscience p. 171
Context: Debunking bad science should be constant obligation of the science community, even if it takes time away from serious research or seems to be a losing battle. One takes comfort from the fact there is no Gresham's laws in science. In the long run, good science drives out bad.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Debunking bad science should be constant obligation of the science community, even if it takes time away from serious r…" by Martin Gardner?
Martin Gardner photo
Martin Gardner 16
recreational mathematician and philosopher 1914–2010

Related quotes

Michael Nielsen photo

“We have to overthrow the idea that it's a diversion from "real" work when scientists conduct high-quality research in the open. Publicly funded science should be open science.”

Michael Nielsen (1974) Australian and Canadian physicist and writer (b.1974)

The New Einsteins Will Be Scientists Who Share https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204644504576653573191370088. In The Wall Street Journal. October 29, 2011.

Michael Crichton photo
Hannes Alfvén photo
John A. Eddy photo
Lewis M. Branscomb photo
Seth MacFarlane photo
Richard Feynman photo

“Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars — mere globs of gas atoms. Nothing is "mere."”

Richard Feynman (1918–1988) American theoretical physicist

I too can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? The vastness of the heavens stretches my imagination — stuck on this carousel my little eye can catch one-million-year-old light. A vast pattern — of which I am a part... What is the pattern, or the meaning, or the why? It does not do harm to the mystery to know a little about it. For far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined! Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?
volume I; lecture 3, "The Relation of Physics to Other Sciences"; section 3-4, "Astronomy"; p. 3-6
The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964)

Thomas Kuhn photo

Related topics