Thomas Piketty cytaty

Thomas Piketty – francuski ekonomista badający zjawisko nierówności dochodowych. Dyrektor ds. badań w École des hautes études en sciences sociales oraz profesor w Paris School of Economics. Autor bestsellerowej książki Capital in the Twenty-First Century , w której opisuje problem nierównomiernej dystrybucji bogactwa i postępujących nierówności dochodowych w krajach rozwiniętych. Jego zdaniem nierówności te rosną wtedy, gdy dochody z kapitału przekraczają tempo wzrostu gospodarczego. Jako rozwiązanie tego problemu proponuje globalny podatek od zysków kapitałowych. Wikipedia  

✵ 7. Maj 1971
Thomas Piketty Fotografia
Thomas Piketty: 25   Cytatów 0   Polubień

Thomas Piketty cytaty

Thomas Piketty: Cytaty po angielsku

“National income is defined as the sum of all income available to the residents of a given country in a given year, regardless of the legal classification of that income.”

Thomas Piketty książka Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Źródło: Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2013), p. 43.

“Capital is defined as the sum total of nonhuman assets that can be owned and exchanged on some market.”

Thomas Piketty książka Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Źródło: Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2013), p. 46.

“To put it bluntly, the discipline of economics has yet to get over its childish passion for mathematics.”

Thomas Piketty książka Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Źródło: Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2013), p. 32.

“The tragedy is that Trump’s program will only strengthen the trend towards inequality.”

We must rethink globalization, or Trumpism will prevail (16 November 2016)

“We know something about billionaire consumption, but it is hard to measure some of it. Some billionaires are consuming politicians, others consume reporters, and some consume academics.”

Quoted in Chuck Collins, Nit-Picking Piketty http://inequality.org/nitpicking-piketty/ (2015).
At ASSA http://events.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Play/b6d6725ea1df49c896fc82465f732e9b1d, 01:40:27.

“The right seems unable to mount any kind of substantive counterattack to Mr. Piketty’s thesis. Instead, the response has been all about name-calling.”

Paul Krugman " The Piketty Panic http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/25/opinion/krugman-the-piketty-panic.html" in nytimes.com, 2014/04/25; cited in: " Six Ways Thomas Piketty's 'Capital' Isn't Holding Up to Scrutiny http://www.forbes.com/sites/kylesmith/2014/05/01/six-ways-thomas-pikettys-capital-isnt-holding-up-to-scrutiny/" by Kyle Smith at forbes.com, 2014/04/25.
About

“Broadly speaking, the rise of the supermanager is largely an Anglo-Saxon phenomenon.”

Thomas Piketty książka Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Źródło: Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2013), p. 315.

“Democracy will never be supplanted by a republic of experts - and that is a very good thing.”

Thomas Piketty książka Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Źródło: Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2013), p. 2.

“I am trying to put the distributional question and the study of long-run trends back at the heart of economic analysis. In that sense, I am pursuing a tradition which was pioneered by the economists of the 19th century, including David Ricardo and Karl Marx. One key difference is that I have a lot more historical data. With the help of Tony Atkinson, Emmanuel Saez, Facundo Alvaredo, Gilles Postel-Vinay, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, Gabriel Zucman and many other scholars, we have been able to collect a unique set of data covering three centuries and over 20 countries. This is by far the most extensive database available in regard to the historical evolution of income and wealth. This book proposes an interpretative synthesis based upon this collective data collection project.”

Eduardo Porter, " Q&A: Thomas Piketty on the Wealth Divide http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/qa-thomas-piketty-on-the-wealth-divide/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0," economix.blogs.nytimes.com, March 11, 2014.
In answer of the question: "Your book fits oddly into the canon of contemporary economics. It focuses not on growth and its determinants, but on how the spoils of growth are divided. In that sense, it reminds us of similar concerns in a book of similar title written 150 years ago: Karl Marx’s “Capital.” What parallels would you draw between the two?"