Noam Chomsky idézet
oldal 8

Noam Chomsky amerikai nyelvész, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professzora, a generatív nyelvtan elméletének megalkotója, filozófus, politikai aktivista, előadó és lektor. Kidolgozója a róla elnevezett Chomsky-hierarchiának.

Az általános nyelvtudomány terén végzett munkásságával nagyban hozzájárult a behaviorizmus hanyatlásához és a kognitív tudomány fellendüléséhez. A nyelvészet terén mutatott kiemelkedő munkája mellett Chomsky az egyik leginkább számon tartott amerikai baloldali értelmiségi, és a vietnámi háború óta világszerte az amerikai külpolitika és gazdaságpolitika éles bírálójaként ismert. Az 1992-es „Arts and Humanities Citation Index” szerint 1980 és 1992 között Chomsky volt a világon a leggyakrabban idézett élő személy. A professzor a politikában is aktívan részt vesz, magát libertariánus szocialistának vallja, és szimpatizál az anarcho-szindikalizmus nézeteivel is. Tagja az Industrial Workers of the World elnevezésű szervezetnek és az Anticionista Mozgalomnak.Chomsky szerint a nyelvtan olyan szabályrendszer, amely meghatározza és létrehozza az adott nyelvben lehetséges, nyelvtanilag helyes mondatok körét. Chomsky megkülönbözteti a nyelv felszíni és mélystruktúráját: a mélystruktúra a nyelv alapja, amely bizonyos transzformációs szabályok segítségével létrehozza a felszíni struktúrát, azaz a nyelvi megnyilvánulásokat. A nyelvi kompetencia, a nyelv használatának képessége minden ember veleszületett tulajdonsága, tehát már a nyelv tanulása előtt megtalálható. Ezek olyan általános struktúrák, melyek az egyes nyelvekben közösek. A nyelv tanulása során ezeket a struktúrákat az adott nyelv igényei szerint állítják be . Wikipedia  

✵ 7. december 1928   •   Más nevek Avram Noam Chomsky, Ноам Чомский, Ноам Хомский
Noam Chomsky fénykép
Noam Chomsky: 335   idézetek 0   Kedvelés

Noam Chomsky idézetek

Noam Chomsky idézet: „Nem kell hősöket keresni, jó ötleteket kell keresnünk.”

Noam Chomsky: Idézetek angolul

“There's a good reason why nobody studies history. It just teaches you too much.”

KGNU benefit at the University of Colorado at Boulder, April 5, 2003 (context: João Goulart) http://www.freespeech.org/fsitv/fscm2/contentviewer.php?content_id=299
Quotes 2000s, 2003

“Personally I'm very much opposed to Hamas' policies in almost every respect. However, we should recognize that the policies of Hamas are more forthcoming and more conducive to a peaceful settlement than those of the United States or Israel. … So, for example, Hamas has called for a long-term indefinite truce on the international border. There is a long-standing international consensus that goes back over thirty years that there should be a two-state political settlement on the international border, the pre-June 1967 border, with minor and mutual modifications. That's the official phrase. Hamas is willing to accept that as a long-term truce. The United States and Israel are unwilling even to consider it… The demand on Hamas by the United States and the European Union and Israel […] is first that they recognize the State of Israel. Actually, that they recognize its right to exist. Well, Israel and the U. S. certainly don't recognize the right of Palestine to exist, nor recognize any state of Palestine. In fact, they have been acting consistently to undermine any such possibility. The second condition is that Hamas must renounce violence. Israel and the United States certainly do not renounce violence. The third condition is that Hamas accept international agreements. The United States and Israel reject international agreements. So, though the policies of Hamas are, again in my view, unacceptable, they happen to be closer to the international consensus on a political peaceful settlement than those of their antagonists, and it's a reflection of the power of the imperial states - the United States and Europe - that they are able to shift the framework, so that the problem appears to be Hamas' policies, and not the more extreme policies of the United States and Israel… And we must remember that in their case it's not just policies. It's not words - it's actions.”

Interview on LBC TV, May 23, 2006 http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1152
Quotes 2000s, 2006

“Cuba has probably been the target of more international terrorism than the rest of the world combined and, therefore, in the American ideological system it is regarded as the source of international terrorism, exactly as Orwell would have predicted.”

Talk titled "American Foreign Policy" at Harvard University, March 19, 1985; Republished at chomsky.info/talks http://www.chomsky.info/talks/19850319.htm, accessed May 23, 2014.
Quotes 1960s-1980s, 1980s

“Stability means we run it. There are countries that are very stable. Cuba is stable, but that’s not called stability.”

Interview by Hugh Gusterson, November 2000 https://web.archive.org/web/20051210055017/http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/2002----.pdf.
Quotes 2000s, 2000

“We might add now that we do have an authoritative account of why the United States bombed Serbia in 1999. It comes from Strobe Talbott, now the director of the Brookings Institution, but in 1999 he was in charge of the State Department-Pentagon team that supervised the diplomacy in the affair. He wrote the introduction to a recent book by his Director of Communications, John Norris, which presents the position of the Clinton administration at the time of the bombing. Norris writes that "it was Yugoslavia's resistance to the broader trends of political and economic reform - not the plight of Kosovar Albanians - that best explains NATO's war". In brief, they were resisting absorption into the U. S. dominated international socioeconomic system. Talbott adds that thanks to John Norris, anyone interested in the war in Kosovo "will know … how events looked and felt at the time to those of us who were involved" in the war, actually directing it. This authoritative explanation will come as no surprise at all to students of international affairs who are more interested in fact than rhetoric. And it will also come as no surprise, to those familiar with intellectual life, that the attack continues to be hailed as a grand achievement of humanitarian intervention, despite massive Western documentation to the contrary, and now an explicit denial at the highest level; which will change nothing, it's not the way intellectual life works.”

Talk at the Englert Theatre in Iowa, April 10, 2006 http://www.greenteaphd.com/greenteablog/?p=252
Quotes 2000s, 2006

“I don't say you're self-censoring - I'm sure you believe everything you're saying; but what I'm saying is, if you believed something different, you wouldn't be sitting where you're sitting.”

Interview by Andrew Marr on BBC2, February 14, 1996 https://web.archive.org/web/19990930034218/http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/interviews/9602-big-idea.html.
Quotes 1990s, 1995-1999

“It is only in folk tales, children's stories, and the journals of intellectual opinion that power is used wisely and well to destroy evil. The real world teaches very different lessons, and it takes willful and dedicated ignorance to fail to perceive them.”

Talk titled "The World After September 11th", AFSC Conference at Tufts University, Massachusetts, December 8, 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20011230091612/http://www.zmag.org/chomskyafter911.htm.
Quotes 2000s, 2001

“Intrinsic (psychological) structure is rich... and diverse.”

Forrás: Quotes 1960s-1980s, 1980s, Rules and Representations (1980), p. 3 as cited in: Jerry Fodor (1983).

“In certain intellectual circles in France, the very basis for discussion—a minimal respect for facts and logic—has been virtually abandoned.”

Noam Chomsky interviewed by an anonymous interviewer, October 26, 1981; Published in: " The Treachery of the Intelligentsia: A French Travesty http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/19811026.htm " in C. P. Otero (ed.), Language and Politics, Black Rose, 1988, pp. 312-323.
Quotes 1960s-1980s, 1980s

“Incidentally, I don't say it [the US electoral system] is a charade; there are differences in the parties—I don’t think they're great differences, but they're real, and small differences in a system of great power can have enormous consequences.”

Noam Chomsky, Al Jazeera ‘UpFront’ interview with host Mehdi Hasan concerning the 2016 US Presidential Election, (Jan 30, 2016) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btJfkPBLULg
Quotes 2010s, 2016

Hasonló szerzők

Henri Bergson fénykép
Henri Bergson 2
Nobel-díjas francia filozófus
Ludwig Wittgenstein fénykép
Ludwig Wittgenstein 7
osztrák-brit filozófus
Simone Weil fénykép
Simone Weil 2
francia írónő, aktivista, filozófus és misztikus
Simone de Beauvoir fénykép
Simone de Beauvoir 15
francia írónő, filozófus
Rudolf Steiner fénykép
Rudolf Steiner 6
osztrák filozófus, író, az Antropozófia megalapítója
Albert Schweitzer fénykép
Albert Schweitzer 35
német teológus, lelkész, filozófus, orgonaművész, tanár, or…
Bertrand Russell fénykép
Bertrand Russell 36
angol matematikus, logikatudós, filozófus és szociológus, K…
Jorge Luis Borges fénykép
Jorge Luis Borges 37
argentin költő, elbeszélő, esszéíró, irodalomtörténész, fil…
Gilbert Keith Chesterton fénykép
Gilbert Keith Chesterton 35
angol író, filozófus, teológus