Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley (1828–1921) English judge
In re A. B. & Co. (1900), L. R. 1 Q. B. D. [1900], C. A. p. 544. See also Ex-parte Blain, 12 Ch. D. 522; In re Pearson (1892), 2 Q. B. 263.
Letter to Sir Henry Peek http://wist.info/salisbury-lord/5899/ (1888) <br class="br">1880s
Nathaniel Lindley, Baron Lindley (1828–1921) English judge
In re A. B. & Co. (1900), L. R. 1 Q. B. D. [1900], C. A. p. 544. See also Ex-parte Blain, 12 Ch. D. 522; In re Pearson (1892), 2 Q. B. 263.
John Holt (Lord Chief Justice) (1642–1710) English lawyer and Lord Chief Justice of England
Rex v. Beare (1698), 1 Raym. 418. For the antiquity of this notion, see Vinnius, 741, by the law of the twelve tables.
Richard Arden, 1st Baron Alvanley (1744–1804) British judge and politician
Eagleton v. East India Co. (1802), 3 Bos. and Pull. 67.
Harlan F. Stone (1872–1946) United States federal judge
Tyson and Brother v. Banton, 273 U.S. 418, 451 (1927).
Charles Grey, 2nd Earl Grey (1764–1845) Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
Letter to Princess Lieven (18 August 1828), reprinted in Guy Le Strange (ed.), Correspondence of Princess Lieven and Earl Grey. Volume I: 1824 to 1830 (London: Richard Bentley and Son, 1890), p. 130.
1820s
Harry Truman (1884–1972) American politician, 33rd president of the United States (in office from 1945 to 1953)
Address at the National Archives dedicating a shrine for the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights (15 December 1952) https://trumanlibrary.org/calendar/viewpapers.php?pid=2102 <br class="br">Context: Of course, there are dangers in religious freedom and freedom of opinion. But to deny these rights is worse than dangerous, it is absolutely fatal to liberty. The external threat to liberty should not drive us into suppressing liberty at home. Those who want the Government to regulate matters of the mind and spirit are like men who are so afraid of being murdered that they commit suicide to avoid assassination.<br>All freedom-loving nations, not the United States alone, are facing a stern challenge from the Communist tyranny. In the circumstances, alarm is justified. The man who isn't alarmed simply doesn't understand the situation — or he is crazy. But alarm is one thing, and hysteria is another. Hysteria impels people to destroy the very thing they are struggling to preserve.<br>Invasion and conquest by Communist armies would be a horror beyond our capacity to imagine. But invasion and conquest by Communist ideas of right and wrong would be just as bad.<br>For us to embrace the methods and morals of communism in order to defeat Communist aggression would be a moral disaster worse than any physical catastrophe. If that should come to pass, then the Constitution and the Declaration would be utterly dead and what we are doing today would be the gloomiest burial in the history of the world.
John Woolman (1720–1772) American Quaker preacher
Source: The Journal of John Woolman (1774), p. 36; as cited in: Ruth Marie Griffith (2008) American Religions: A Documentary History. p. 137
William Logan (author) book Malabar Manual
Malabar Manual, Page 121 https://archive.org/details/MalabarLogan/page/n133 <br class="br">Malabar Manual (1887)
“I want them [criminals] to literally feel terror at the thought of committing offences.”
Priti Patel (1972) British politician
I want criminals to be terrified, says Priti Patel: New Home Secretary vows to return to zero-tolerance policing as she demands full explanation over bungled 'Nick' sex abuse inquiry https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7316055/I-want-criminals-terrified-says-Priti-Patel-Home-Secretary-restore-confidence-Britain.html (2 August 2019) <br class="br">2019