This means that under international law, no country can ever pass a law that allows torture. There can be no immunity from criminal liability for violation of a “jus cogens” prohibition. The United States has always prohibited torture — in our Constitution, laws, executive orders, judicial decisions and treaties. When we ratify a treaty, it becomes part of US law under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. “No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification for torture,” the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which the US ratified, states unequivocally. Torture is considered a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions, also ratified by the United States. Geneva classifies grave breaches as war crimes. The US War Crimes Act and 18 USC, sections 818 and 3231, punish torture, willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, and inhuman, humiliating or degrading treatment. And the Torture Statute criminalizes the commission, attempt, or conspiracy to commit torture outside the United States.
State-Sanctioned Torture in the Age of Trump https://truthout.org/articles/state-sanctioned-torture-in-the-age-of-trump/, by Marjorie Cohn, Truthout (23 January 2017)
“Judges ought to remember, that their office is jus dicere, and not jus dare; to interpret law, and not to make law, or give law.”
Of Judicature
Essays (1625)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Francis Bacon 295
English philosopher, statesman, scientist, jurist, and auth… 1561–1626Related quotes

Report of the Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order on the right of self determination http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/IntOrder/Pages/Reports.aspx.
2015, Report submitted to the UN General Assembly

“It is the principle of the common law, that an officer ought not to take money for doing his duty.”
Stotesbury v. Smith (1759), 2 Burr. Part IV. 928.

The Essays Or Counsels, Civil And Moral, Of Francis Ld. Verulam Viscount St. Albans (1625), Of Judicature

Isherwood v. Oldknow (1815), 3M. &S. (K. B. Rep.) 396, 397.

Colt v. Glover (1614), Lord Hobart's Rep. 157.

“The proper role of the judiciary is one of interpreting and applying the law, not making it.”
Testimony at her confirmation hearing, reported in the New York Times (February 23, 1984).

“That which is not just, is not Law; and that which is not Law, ought not to be obeyed.”
Ch. 3, Sect. 11 http://www.constitution.org/as/dcg_311.htm
Discourses Concerning Government (1689)