“From one viewpoint there were (potentially) a multiplicity of Gleisters; but from another viewpoint there was only one, and he was that one. After all, it didn’t matter what these other people called themselves or where they came from; he was only the person he was here and now, the person whom he experienced. Reality is positional, ego is relational, and nature doesn’t deal in abstractions.”

Source: Culture series, Excession (1996), Chapter 4 “Dependency Principle” section V (p. 129).

The Education of Henry Adams (1907)

Session 242, Page 22
The Early Sessions: Sessions 1-42, 1997, The Early Sessions: Book 6

Recreation (1919)
Context: I am not attempting here a full appreciation of Colonel Roosevelt. He will be known for all time as one of the great men of America. I am only giving you this personal recollection as a little contribution to his memory, as one that I can make from personal knowledge and which is now known only to myself. His conversation about birds was made interesting by quotations from poets. He talked also about politics, and in the whole of his conversation about them there was nothing but the motive of public spirit and patriotism. I saw enough of him to know that to be with him was to be stimulated in the best sense of the word for the work of life. Perhaps it is not yet realised how great he was in the matter of knowledge as well as in action. Everybody knows that he was a great man of action in the fullest sense of the word. The Press has always proclaimed that. It is less often that a tribute is paid to him as a man of knowledge as well as a man of action. Two of your greatest experts in natural history told me the other day that Colonel Roosevelt could, in that department of knowledge, hold his own with experts. His knowledge of literature was also very great, and it was knowledge of the best. It is seldom that you find so great a man of action who was also a man of such wide and accurate knowledge. I happened to be impressed by his knowledge of natural history and literature and to have had first-hand evidence of both, but I gather from others that there were other fields of knowledge in which he was also remarkable.

Source: On Liberty (1859), Ch. II: Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion

Source: Hainish Cycle, Rocannon’s World (1966), Chapter 9

Ch 1 : Production https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/mill-james/ch01.htm &lt;!-- Cited in: Monthly Review https://books.google.nl/books?id=qytZAAAAcAAJ&amp;pg=PA134, 1822 And partly cited in: Karl Marx. Human Requirements and Division of Labour https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/needs.htm, Manuscript, 1844. --&gt; <br class="br">Elements of Political Economy (1821)

John 10:30
Brief Exposition #44