William H. Starbuck (1934) American academic
Source: Learning by knowledge‐intensive firms," 1992, p. 717
The Rickover Effect (1992)
Context: As a guide to engineering ethics, I should like to commend to you a liberal adaptation of the injunction contained in the oath of Hippocrates that the professional man do nothing that will harm his client. Since engineering is a profession which affects the material basis of everyone’s life, there is almost always an unconsulted third party involved in any contact between the engineer and those who employ him — and that is the country, the people as a whole. These, too, are the engineer’s clients, albeit involuntarily. Engineering ethics ought therefore to safeguard their interests most carefully. Knowing more about the public effects his work will have, the engineer ought to consider himself an “officer of the court” and keep the general interest always in mind.
William H. Starbuck (1934) American academic
Source: Learning by knowledge‐intensive firms," 1992, p. 717
Nathaniel Borenstein (1957) American computer scientist
Footnote in a paper about computational email. <br class="br"> Computational Mail as Network Infrastructure for Computer-Supported Cooperative Work http://www.guppylake.com/~nsb/CSCW-ATOMICMAIL.txt <br class="br"> Collected quotes about computer languages http://www.sysprog.net/quotlang.html <br class="br">Attributed
Jamie Zawinski (1968) American programmer
http://phd.pp.ru/Texts/fun/signatures.txt
PP
RU
Texts
Signatures.
“If you can think of nothing that wouldn't do harm, then do nothing.”
Noam Chomsky (1928) american linguist, philosopher and activist
Panel with Edward Said at Columbia University, New York, April 1999 http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/04/07/042214 <br class="br">Quotes 1990s, 1995-1999 <br class="br">Context: Let me just put the whole thing in a kind of mundane level. Like, suppose you walk out in the street, this evening, and you see a crime being committed, you know, somebody is robbing someone else. Well, you have three choices. One choice is to try to stop it, maybe you call 911 or something. Another choice is to do nothing. A third choice is to pick up an assault rifle and kill 'em both, and kill a bystander at the same time. Well, suppose you do that, and somebody says, "Well, you know, why did you do that?" And you say, "Look, I couldn't stand by and do nothing." I mean, is that a response? If you can think of nothing that wouldn't do harm, then do nothing. And the same is true, magnified, in international affairs. Apart from the fact that there were things that could have been done.
John Locke book Some Thoughts Concerning Education
Sec. 110
Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693)
Richard Hamming (1915–1998) American mathematician and information theorist
The Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn (1991), p. 5