
“Science may explain aspects of art but it will not replace the inspiration that art evokes…”
The Age of Insight (2012)
The Open Universe : An Argument for Indeterminism (1992), p. 44
“Science may explain aspects of art but it will not replace the inspiration that art evokes…”
The Age of Insight (2012)
Source: Advanced Systems Thinking, Engineering and Management (2003), p. 309; partly cited in: Kurt A. Richardson, Wendy J. Gregory, Gerald Midgley (2006) Systems Thinking and Complexity Science. p. 39
“Better is art, than evil strength; for with art men may hold what strength may not obtain.”
Source: Brut, Line 8590; vol. 2, p. 297.
“There is but one art, to omit.”
As cited in The Harper Book of Quotations, Revised Edition (1993), Ed. R. Fitzhenry, HarperCollins, p. 498 : ISBN 0062732137, 9780062732132
Pask (1966) The Cybernetics of Human Performance and Learning. Cited in: George J. Klír (2001) Facets of Systems Science. p. 429.
1951 - 1968, The Creative Act', 1957
Context: I want to clarify our understanding of the word 'art' – to be sure, without an attempt to a definition. What I have in mind is that art may be bad, good or indifferent, but, whatever adjective is used, we must call it art, and bad art is still art in the same way as a bad emotion is still an emotion.
Therefore, when I refer to 'art coefficient', it will be understood that I refer not only to great art, but I am trying to describe the subjective mechanism which produces art in a raw state – 'à l'état brute' – bad, good or indifferent.
This Business of Living (1935-1950)
“We, by our arts may be called the grandsons of God.”
The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci (1883), X Studies and Sketches for Pictures and Decorations
“We may with advantage at times forget what we know.”
Maxim 234
Sentences, The Moral Sayings of Publius Syrus, a Roman Slave