“Physicists, for all their odd notions, are basically a conservative lot.”

Address to the Society for Psychical Research (1897)
Context: The clock runs down. I lift the weight by exerting the proper amount of energy, and in this action the law of conservation of energy is strictly obeyed. But now I have the choice of either letting the weight fall free in a fraction of a second, or, constrained by the wheelwork, in twenty-four hours. I can do which I like, and whichever way I decide, no more energy is developed in the fall of the weight. I strike a match; I can use it to light a cigarette or to set fire to a house. I write a telegram; it may be simply to say I shall be late for dinner, or it may produce fluctuations on the stock exchange that will ruin thousands. In these cases the actual force required in striking the match or in writing the telegram is governed by the law or conservation of energy; but the vastly more momentous part, which determines the words I use or the material I ignite, is beyond such a law. It is probable that no expenditure of energy need be used in the determination of direction one way more than another. Intelligence and free will here come into play, and these mystic forces are outside the law of conservation of energy as understood by physicists.

Self-quoted in The Whitlam Government 1972–1975 by Gough Whitlam

BBC interview

2010s, 2010, The great peasant revolt of 2010 (2010)

J. R. Partington, Higher Mathematics for Chemical Students (1911)

Source: Hainish Cycle, (1974), Chapter 7 (p. 203)

Source: An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications (Third Edition), Chapter V, Conditional Probability, Stochastic Independence, p. 114.

Poul Anderson: Fifty Years of Science Fiction (1997)

Source: The Red Queen (1993), Ch. 3