Russell Jacoby (1945) American historian
Source: Social Amnesia: A Critique of Conformist Psychology from Adler to Laing (1975), p. 30
1840s, On the Concept of Irony with Continual Reference to Socrates (1841)
Russell Jacoby (1945) American historian
Source: Social Amnesia: A Critique of Conformist Psychology from Adler to Laing (1975), p. 30
Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (1891–1956) Father of republic India, champion of human rights, father of India's Constitution, polymath, revolutionary…
As quoted in http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/txt_ambedkar_salvation.html
Benito Mussolini book The Doctrine of Fascism
"The Doctrine of Fascism" Firenze: Vallecchi Editore (1935 version), p. 13
1930s
Anthony Giddens (1938) British sociologist
(describing Marx’s view), p. 35.
Capitalism and Modern Social Theory (1971)
Gottlob Frege (1848–1925) mathematician, logician, philosopher
Translation J. L. Austin (Oxford, 1950) as quoted by Stephen Toulmin, Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts (1972) Vol. 1, p. 56.
Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, 1893 and 1903
“The history of the race is but that of the individual "writ large."”
George Henry Lewes (1817–1878) British philosopher
Vol. 2, p. 135
The Foundations of a Creed (1874-5)
Ze Frank (1972) American online performance artist
http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/05/052406.html
"The Show" (www.zefrank.com/theshow/)
Robert A. Heinlein book The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress
The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress (1966)
Context: A rational anarchist believes that concepts, such as "state" and "society" and "government" have no existence save as physically exemplified in the acts of self-responsible individuals. He believes that it is impossible to shift blame, share blame, distribute blame... as blame, guilt, responsibility are matters taking place inside human beings singly and nowhere else. But being rational, he knows that not all individuals hold his evaluations, so he tries to live perfectly in an imperfect world... aware that his efforts will be less than perfect yet undismayed by self-knowledge of self-failure.