“Very early, I understood that women were required to be other than what they were.”

—  Andre Dubus

Of Robin Hood and Womanhood.
Broken Vessels (1991)

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Very early, I understood that women were required to be other than what they were." by Andre Dubus?
Andre Dubus photo
Andre Dubus 9
Novelist, short story writer, teacher 1936–1999

Related quotes

Howard Zinn photo
Audre Lorde photo
Nancy Bird Walton photo

“Other women who flew were women of independent means. But I had to do something with it.”

Nancy Bird Walton (1915–2009) Australian aviatrix

Nancy Bird Walton in March 2004 http://www.cultureandrecreation.gov.au/articles/aviation/aviatrices/

Socrates photo

“What I have understood is good; and so, I think, what I have not understood is; only the book requires a Delian diver to get at the meaning of it.”

Socrates (-470–-399 BC) classical Greek Athenian philosopher

Diogenes Laertius

Tina Turner photo
Ray Comfort photo

“Darwin believed that women were not as competent as men, and less intelligent than men, but they were better than a dog.”

Ray Comfort (1949) New Zealand-born Christian minister and evangelist

The Origin of Species: 150th Anniversary Edition (2009)

Pierre Joseph Proudhon photo

“If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to take from a man his thought, his will, his personality, is a power of life and death; and that to enslave a man is to kill him. Why, then, to this other question: What is property! may I not likewise answer, It is robbery, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?”

Pierre Joseph Proudhon (1809–1865) French politician, mutualist philosopher, economist, and socialist

Source: What is Property? (1840), Ch. I: "Method Pursued in this Work. The Idea of a Revolution"
Context: If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to take from a man his thought, his will, his personality, is a power of life and death; and that to enslave a man is to kill him. Why, then, to this other question: What is property! may I not likewise answer, It is robbery, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?
I undertake to discuss the vital principle of our government and our institutions, property: I am in my right. I may be mistaken in the conclusion which shall result from my investigations: I am in my right. I think best to place the last thought of my book first: still am I in my right.

Íngrid Betancourt photo
Salwa Bugaighis photo

“They knew that women were very effective and very strong in this revolution, but they think that now, the role is for the man.”

Salwa Bugaighis (1963–2014) Libyan activist

Salwa Bugaighis after resigning here position at the Libya’s National Transitional Council, quoted in: Salwa Bugaighis http://www.vitalvoices.org/node/2680 at vitalvoices.org, 2014

Françoise Sagan photo

“Paul had always thought that women were never more serious than when they were naked.”

Françoise Sagan (1935–2004) French writer

Un chagrin de passage (1994, A Fleeting Sorrow, translated 1995)

Related topics