Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 34-35
Context: Everywhere, when societies originate, we see the strongest, most warlike races seizing the exclusive government of the society. Everywhere we see these races seizing a monopoly on security within certain more or less extensive boundaries, depending on their number and strength.And, this monopoly being, by its very nature, extraordinarily profitable, everywhere we see the races invested with the monopoly on security devoting themselves to bitter struggles, in order to add to the extent of their market, the number of their forced consumers, and hence the amount of their gains.War has been the necessary and inevitable consequence of the establishment of a monopoly on security.Another inevitable consequence has been that this monopoly has engendered all other monopolies.
Gustave de Molinari: Security
Gustave de Molinari was Belgian political economist and classical liberal theorist. Explore interesting quotes on security.
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 24
Context: But why should there be an exception relative to security? What special reason is there that the production of security cannot be relegated to free competition? Why should it be subjected to a different principle and organized according to a different system?
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 22
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 22–23.
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 34-35
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 27–28
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 34-35
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 57-59
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 20-21
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 31
Source: The Production of Security (1849), p. 57-59