“It's never too late to rewrite one's own history, The time already lived is not a limit, but a basis from which to start again. The ability to renew oneself and seek happiness does not have an expiration date.”
Original: Non è mai troppo tardi per riscrivere la propria storia, il tempo già vissuto non è un limite, ma una base da cui ripartire. La capacità di rinnovarsi e cercare la felicità non ha una data di scadenza.
Source: prevale.net
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Prevale1328
Italian DJ and producer 1983Related quotes
“It's never too late to have a happy childhood.”
Tom Robbins book Still Life with Woodpecker
Source: Still Life with Woodpecker (1980)
Eric Roth (1945) American screenwriter
Source: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button Screenplay
“It's never too late to start a new beginning”
Eminem (1972) American rapper and actor
"Believe"
2010s, Revival (2017)
Vernon Howard (1918–1992) American writer
Esoteric Encyclopedia of Eternal Knowledge
Jonas Salk (1914–1995) Inventor of polio vaccine
Academy of Achievement interview (1991)
Context: What you see in living systems, and in genetic systems, is that the genes are already there, having arisen in the course of time, and when they are needed they become activated. If they had to be invented, the time would be too late. By the same token, I think that the people who are needed to help guide the future already exist. They simply need to recognize this in themselves, react to the opportunities that prevail, and also be valued and be encouraged. It's that very large, and as yet amorphous, rung that is of interest to me. I hope to articulate this, and see to what extent it makes sense to others as well.
Arun Shourie (1941) Indian journalist and politician
Eminent Historians: Their Technology, Their Line, Their Fraud
Context: The most extensive deletions are ordered in regard to the chapter on ‘Aurangzeb’s policy on religion’. Every allusion to what he actually did to the Hindus, to their temples, to the very leitmotif of his rule – to spread the sway of Islam – are directed to be excised from the book. He is to be presented as one who had an aversion – an ordinary sort of aversion, almost a secular one – to music and dancing, to the presence of prostitutes in the court, and that it is these things he banished... In a word, no forcible conversions, no massacres, no destruction of temples. Just that Hinduism had created an exploitative, casteist society. Islam was egalitarian. Hence the oppressed Hindus embraced Islam!
Muslim historians of those times are in raptures at the heap of kafirs who have been dispatched to hell. Muslim historians are forever lavishing praise on the ruler for the temples he has destroyed, for the hundreds of thousands he has got to see the light of Islam. Law books like The Hedaya prescribe exactly the options to which these little textbooks alluded. All whitewashed away.
Objective whitewash for objective history. And today if anyone seeks to restore truth to these textbooks, the shout, ‘Communal rewriting of history’.