“There were so many possible logical holes in that statement that Irene could have used it as a tea-strainer.”

Source: The Burning Page (2016), Chapter 6 (pp. 64-65)

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update Nov. 16, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "There were so many possible logical holes in that statement that Irene could have used it as a tea-strainer." by Genevieve Cogman?
Genevieve Cogman photo
Genevieve Cogman 21
novelist and game designer 1972

Related quotes

“Pig sit still in the strainer
I must have my Pig tea”

Spike Hawkins (1943) British writer

Pig poetry http://www.porkopolis.org/lib/poetry/hawkins-s.htm

R. A. Lafferty photo
Daniel Abraham photo

“There were a lot of holes in that logic that he carefully avoided thinking about.”

Daniel Abraham (1969) speculative fiction writer from the United States

Source: Cibola Burn (2014), Chapter 39 (p. 400)

Karl Popper photo

“A principle of induction would be a statement with the help of which we could put inductive inferences into a logically acceptable form.”

Source: The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), Ch. 1 "A Survey of Some Fundamental Problems", Section I: The Problem of Induction
Context: A principle of induction would be a statement with the help of which we could put inductive inferences into a logically acceptable form. In the eyes of the upholders of inductive logic, a principle of induction is of supreme importance for scientific method: "… this principle", says Reichenbach, "determines the truth of scientific theories. To eliminate it from science would mean nothing less than to deprive science of the power to decide the truth or falsity of its theories. Without it, clearly, science would no longer have the right to distinguish its theories from the fanciful and arbitrary creations of the poet's mind."
Now this principle of induction cannot be a purely logical truth like a tautology or an analytic statement. Indeed, if there were such a thing as a purely logical principle of induction, there would be no problem of induction; for in this case, all inductive inferences would have to be regarded as purely logical or tautological transformations, just like inferences in inductive logic. Thus the principle of induction must be a synthetic statement; that is, a statement whose negation is not self-contradictory but logically possible. So the question arises why such a principle should be accepted at all, and how we can justify its acceptance on rational grounds.

Jonas Salk photo
Carlo Rovelli photo
Fritjof Capra photo
John Von Neumann photo

“A large part of mathematics which becomes useful developed with absolutely no desire to be useful, and in a situation where nobody could possibly know in what area it would become useful; and there were no general indications that it ever would be so.”

John Von Neumann (1903–1957) Hungarian-American mathematician and polymath

"The Role of Mathematics in the Sciences and in Society" (1954) an address to Princeton alumni, published in John von Neumann : Collected Works (1963) edited by A. H. Taub <!-- Macmillan, New York -->; also quoted in Out of the Mouths of Mathematicians : A Quotation Book for Philomaths (1993) by R. Schmalz
Context: A large part of mathematics which becomes useful developed with absolutely no desire to be useful, and in a situation where nobody could possibly know in what area it would become useful; and there were no general indications that it ever would be so. By and large it is uniformly true in mathematics that there is a time lapse between a mathematical discovery and the moment when it is useful; and that this lapse of time can be anything from 30 to 100 years, in some cases even more; and that the whole system seems to function without any direction, without any reference to usefulness, and without any desire to do things which are useful.

Robert Maynard Hutchins photo

Related topics