
God doesn't believe in atheists (2002)
Source: 2000s, Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple (2002)
God doesn't believe in atheists (2002)
Source: Space Chantey (1968), Ch. 1
Context: The war was finished. It had lasted ten equivalent years and taken ten million lives. Thus it was neither of long duration nor of serious attrition. It hadn't any great significance; it was not intended to have. It did not prove a point, since all points had long ago been proven. What it did, perhaps, was to emphasize an aspect, sharpen a concept, underline a trend.
On the whole it was a successful operation. Economically and ecologically it was of healthy effect, and who should grumble?
And after wars, men go home. No, no, men start for home. It's not the same.
Source: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, 1999, p. 88
Source: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, 1999, p. 88
“People often behave badly when they are trying to prove a point.”
Source: Culture series, Inversions (1998), Chapter 10 (p. 177)
Preface to the 1913 edition
1890s, Quintessence Of Ibsenism (1891; 1913)
Context: I have never admitted the right of an elderly author to alter the work of a young author, even when the young author happens to be his former self. In the case of a work which is a mere exhibition of skill in conventional art, there may be some excuse for the delusion that the longer the artist works on it the nearer he will bring it to perfection. Yet even the victims of this delusion must see that there is an age limit to the process, and that though a man of forty-five may improve the workmanship of a man of thirty-five, it does not follow that a man of fifty-five can do the same.
When we come to creative art, to the living word of a man delivering a message to his own time, it is clear that any attempt to alter this later on is simply fraud and forgery. As I read the old Quintessence of Ibsenism I may find things that I see now at a different angle, or correlate with so many things then unnoted by me that they take on a different aspect. But though this may be a reason for writing another book, it is not a reason for altering an existing one.
“They will explain themselves — as all poems should do without any comment.”
Letter to George Keats (1818)
Letters (1817–1820)
Interview on Narniafans April 30th, 2006 by Paul Martin http://www.narniafans.com/archives/849
Pontén flippar http://blog.brokep.com/2008/11/05/ponten-flippar/