Part I. Ch. 1 : The Selection of Facts, p. 22
Science and Method (1908)
Context: The scientist does not study nature because it is useful to do so. He studies it because he takes pleasure in it, and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful it would not be worth knowing, and life would not be worth living. I am not speaking, of course, of the beauty which strikes the senses, of the beauty of qualities and appearances. I am far from despising this, but it has nothing to do with science. What I mean is that more intimate beauty which comes from the harmonious order of its parts, and which a pure intelligence can grasp.
“It is impossible for someone to dispel his fears about the most important matters if he doesn't know the nature of the universe but still gives some credence to myths. So without the study of nature there is no enjoyment of pure pleasure.”
12
Variant translation: One cannot rid himself of his primal fears if he does not understand the nature of the universe, but instead suspects the truth of some mythical story. So without the study of nature, there can be no enjoyment of pure pleasure. http://www.epicurus.info/etexts/PD.html
Sovereign Maxims
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Epicurus 30
ancient Greek philosopher -341–-269 BCRelated quotes
Sex, Laughter, and Real-God-Realization 1975
http://www.fearnomorezoo.org/literature/slg.php
“Western Civ,” p. 18.
Giants and Dwarfs (1990)
Source: Man's Moral Nature (1879), Ch. 1 : Lines of Cleavage
Letter Accepting 2018 Andrei Sakharov Prizefrom (2018)
How To Defend Society Against Science (1975)
2000s, 2008, First Speech As London Mayor (May 3, 2008)
Source: Epigrams, p. 364
Cited in: Rex Robert Dolan (1967). The big change: the challenge to radical change in the Church.
Source: The step to man, 1966, p.178.
Source: Reflections and Maxims (1746), p. 176.