The Tragic Sense of Life (1913), II : The Starting-Point
Context: The truth is sum, ergo cogito — I am, therefore I think, although not everything that is thinks. Is not consciousness of thinking above all consciousness of being? Is pure thought possible, without consciousness of self, without personality? Can there exist pure knowledge without feeling, without that species of materiality which feelings lends to it? Do we not perhaps feel thought, and do we not feel ourselves in the act of knowing and willing? Could not the man in the stove [Descartes] have said: "I feel, therefore I am"? or "I will, therefore I am"? And to feel oneself, is it not perhaps to feel oneself imperishable?
“Although I think that life may be the result of an accident, I do not think that of consciousness.”
As quoted in The Observer (11 January 1931); also in Psychic Research (1931), Vol. 25, p. 91
Context: Although I think that life may be the result of an accident, I do not think that of consciousness. Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Erwin Schrödinger 67
Austrian physicist 1887–1961Related quotes
The Tragic Sense of Life (1913), II : The Starting-Point
“I think it a very happy accident.”
Source: Don Quixote de la Mancha (1605–1615), Part II (1615), Book III, Ch. 58.
“The consciousness that says 'I am' is not the consciousness that thinks.”
Greek Exercises (1888); at the age of fifteen, Russell used to write down his reflections in this book, for fear that his people should find out what he was thinking.
Youth
Interview by Lizo Mzimba (February 2003) <!-- published where? -->
2000s
“I think it's a new feature. Don't tell anyone it was an accident.”
On s/foo/bar/eieio [10911@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV, 1991]
Usenet postings, 1991
Source: My Stroke of Insight: A Brain Scientist's Personal Journey