“Any character or proposition either concerns one subject, two subjects, or a plurality of subjects.”

On The Algebra of Logic (1885)
Context: Any character or proposition either concerns one subject, two subjects, or a plurality of subjects. For example, one particle has mass, two particles attract one another, a particle revolves about the line joining two others. A fact concerning two subjects is a dual character or relation; but a relation which is a mere combination of two independent facts concerning the two subjects may be called degenerate, just as two lines are called a degenerate conic. In like manner a plural character or conjoint relation is to be called degenerate if it is a mere compound of dual characters.
A sign is in a conjoint relation to the thing denoted and to the mind. If this triple relation is not of a degenerate species, the sign is related to its object only in consequence of a mental association, and depends upon a habit. Such signs are always abstract and general, because habits are general rules to which the organism has become subjected. They are, for the most part, conventional or arbitrary. They include all general words, the main body of speech, and any mode of conveying a judgment. For the sake of brevity I will call them tokens.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Any character or proposition either concerns one subject, two subjects, or a plurality of subjects." by Charles Sanders Peirce?
Charles Sanders Peirce photo
Charles Sanders Peirce 121
American philosopher, logician, mathematician, and scientist 1839–1914

Related quotes

Maimónides photo

“He who thinks he can have flesh and bones without being subject to any external influence, or any accidents of matter, unconsciously wishes to reconcile two opposites, viz., to be at the same time subject and not subject to change. If man were never subject to change there could be no generation; there would be one single being, but no individuals forming a species.”

Compare Galileo, "...for my part I consider the earth very noble and admirable precisely because of the diverse alterations, changes, generations, etc. that occur in it incessantly. If, not being subject to any changes... I should deem it a useless lump in the universe, devoid of activity and, in a word, superfluous and essentially non-existent." Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632)
Source: Guide for the Perplexed (c. 1190), Part III, Ch.12

Hilaire Belloc photo

“Any subject can be made interesting, and therefore any subject can be made boring.”

Hilaire Belloc (1870–1953) writer

XIII. A Guide to Boring
A Conversation with a Cat, and Others (1931)

“As one learns the language of a subject, one is also learning what the subject is.”

Neil Postman (1931–2003) American writer and academic

Language Education in a Knowledge Context (1980)
Context: As one learns the language of a subject, one is also learning what the subject is.... what we call a subject consists mostly, if not entirely, of its language. If you eliminate all the words of a subject, you have eliminated the subject.

Robert E. Lee photo

“Negroes belonging to our citizens are not considered subjects of exchange and were not included in my proposition.”

Robert E. Lee (1807–1870) Confederate general in the Civil War

To Ulysses S. Grant on why black U.S. soldiers were not be repatriated by the Confederacy, as quoted in Liberty, Equality, Power: Enhanced Concise Edition https://books.google.com/books?id=1w5Qp4qYfE0C&pg=PA433#v=onepage&q&f=false (2009), California: Cengage Learning, p. 433
1860s

Arthur Kekewich photo

“Motives do not concern me; they are a dangerous subject with which to deal.”

Arthur Kekewich (1832–1907) British judge

Whelan v. Palmer (1888), L. J. Rep. (N. S.) 57 C. D. 788.

John Rogers Searle photo

“Where conscious subjectivity is concerned, there is no distinction between the observation and the thing observed.”

John Rogers Searle (1932) American philosopher

The Rediscovery of the Mind, p. 97, MIT Press (1992) ISBN 0-262-69154-X.

“We never have any understanding of any subject matter except in terms of our own mental constructs of "things" and "happenings" of that subject matter.”

Douglas T. Ross (1929–2007) American computer scientist

Source: Structured analysis (SA): A language for communicating ideas (1977), p. 19.

Thomas Nagel photo

Related topics