
What Would You Substitute for the Bible as a Moral Guide? (1900)
A Christmas Sermon (1890)
What Would You Substitute for the Bible as a Moral Guide? (1900)
Source: Christianity and the Social Crisis (1907), Ch.1 The Historical Roots of Christianity the Hebrew Prophets, p. 4
Vol. I, Ch. 14, Section 5, pg. 396.
(Buch I) (1867)
Answer to Lyman Abbott (unfinished), responding to Abbott, Lyman. "Flaws in Ingersollism." The North American Review 150, no. 401 (1890): 446-457.
Some Reasons Why (1881)
Context: My great objection to the Old Testament is the cruelty said to have been commanded by God. All these cruelties ceased with death. The vengeance of Jehovah stopped at the tomb. He never threatened to punish the dead; and there is not one word, from the first mistake in Genesis to the last curse of Malachi, containing the slightest intimation that God will take his revenge in another world. It was reserved for the New Testament to make known the doctrine of eternal pain. The teacher of universal benevolence rent the veil between time and eternity, and fixed the horrified gaze of man upon the lurid gulf of hell. Within the breast of non-resistance coiled the worm that never dies. Compared with this, the doctrine of slavery, the wars of extermination, the curses, the punishments of the Old Testament were all merciful and just.
“To be Christian is to be one of those whom God has chosen. God has chosen black people!”
Source: Black Theology and Black Power (1969), pp. 139-140
The Tragic Sense of Life (1913), VIII : From God to God