
“science is the best way to do anything”
if you want to do terrible things with technology, a terrible weapons for example science is the best way to do it because science is the best way to do anything
“science is the best way to do anything”
if you want to do terrible things with technology, a terrible weapons for example science is the best way to do it because science is the best way to do anything
as quoted by [Steven Chu and Charles H. Townes, Biographical Memoirs V.83, National Academies Press, 2003, 0-309-08699-X, 201]
“The best way to describe anyone is to give an example of the kind of thing he would do.”
In Joy Still Felt (1980), p. 499
General sources
[2011-12-13, Interview with Alvin Plantinga on Where the Conflict Really Lies, Paul, Pardi, Philosophy News, http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2011/12/13/Interview-with-Alvin-Plantinga-on-Where-the-Conflict-Really-Lies.aspx]
Posed question: Are you mainly trying to show that there's no logical conflict even though there might be a methodological conflict?
The Richard Dimbleby Lecture: Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder (1996)
The Evolutionary Future of Man (1993)
Source: Priest receives top environmental award https://www.ucanews.com/news/priest-receives-top-environmental-award/52279 (6 June 2012)
Source: On Writing Well (Fifth Edition, orig. pub. 1976), Chapter 13, Bits & Pieces, p. 136.
“Things do not always happen the way I would have wanted, and it's best that I get used to that.”
Source: Like the Flowing River