“Of the contemporaries of Newton one of the most prominent was John Wallis. …Wallis was a voluminous writer, and not only are his writings erudite, but they show a genius in mathematics… He was one of the first to recognize the significance of the generalization of exponents to include negative and fractional as well as positive and integral numbers. He recognized also the importance of Cavalieri's method of indivisibles, and employed it in the quadrature of such curves as y=xn, y=x1/n, and y=x0 + x1 + x2 +… He failed in his attempts at the approximate quadrature of the circle by means of series because he was not in possession of the general form of the binomial theorem. He reached the result, however, by another method. He also obtained the equivalent of ds = \! dx \sqrt{1+(\frac{dy}{dx})^2} for the length of an element of a curve, thus connecting the problem of rectification with that of quadrature.”
History of Mathematics (1923) Vol.1
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
David Eugene Smith 33
American mathematician 1860–1944Related quotes
Source: Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times (1972), p. 253.

“Mice: What is the best early training for a writer?
Y. C.: An unhappy childhood.”
Source: Ernest Hemingway on Writing

The point P where the two parabolas intersect is given by<center><math>\begin{cases}y^2 = bx\\x^2 = ay\end{cases}</math></center>whence, as before,<center><math>\frac{a}{x} = \frac{x}{y} = \frac{y}{b}.</math></center>
Apollonius of Perga (1896)
Philosophy and Real Politics (2008).
Philosophy and Real Politics (2008)

LSD psychotherapy (1980), MAPS 2001 edition, Epilogue, p. 300.

“This method of mine takes its beginnings where Cavalieri ends his Method of indivisibles.”
...for as his was the Geometry of indivisibles, so I have chosen to call my method the Arithmetic of infinitesimals.
Arithmetica Infinitorum (1656)

As quoted by E.S. Pearson, Karl Pearson: An Appreciation of Some Aspects of his Life and Work (1938) and cited in Bernard J. Norton, "Karl Pearson and Statistics: The Social Origins of Scientific Innovation" in Social Studies of Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, Theme Issue: Sociology of Mathematics (Feb.,1978), pp. 3-34.

Source: Simon Stevin: Science in the Netherlands around 1600, 1970, p. 17-18