“Consistency of the person's strategic preference across tests (and subject matters) is curiously high.”

—  Gordon Pask

Source: Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies, and Conceptual or Learning Style (1988), p. 85. as cited in: Colin A. Hardy, Michael Mawer (1999) Learning and Teaching in Physical Education. p. 62.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Consistency of the person's strategic preference across tests (and subject matters) is curiously high." by Gordon Pask?
Gordon Pask photo
Gordon Pask 30
British psychologist 1928–1996

Related quotes

Arthur Stanley Eddington photo

“The whole subject-matter of exact science consists of pointer readings and similar indications.”

Arthur Stanley Eddington (1882–1944) British astrophysicist

Source: The Nature of the Physical World (1928), Ch. 10 The New Quantum Theory <!-- p. 219 -->

Walter Pater photo

“What we have to do is to be forever curiously testing new opinions and courting new impressions.”

Walter Pater (1839–1894) essayist, art and literature critic, fiction writer

Conclusion
The Renaissance http://www.authorama.com/renaissance-1.html (1873)

Gregory Benford photo

“No matter how much you plan for it, the real thing seems curiously, well, unreal.”

Source: Timescape (1980), Chapter 37 (p. 395)

John Cage photo

“As far as consistency of thought goes, I prefer inconsistency.”

John Cage (1912–1992) American avant-garde composer

Quote from an interview by John Corbett (1989)
1980s
Source: Silence

Milan Kundera photo
Erich Fromm photo

“The confusion between temperament and character has had serious consequences for ethical theory. Preferences with regard to differences in temperament are mere matters of subjective taste. But differences in character are ethically of the most fundamental importance.”

Erich Fromm (1900–1980) German social psychologist and psychoanalyst

Source: Man for Himself (1947), Ch. 3
Context: Temperament refers to the mode of reaction and is constitutional and not changeable; character is essentially formed by a person’s experiences, especially of those in early life, and changeable, to some extent, by insights and new kinds of experiences. If a person has a choleric temperament, for instance, his mode of reaction is "quick and strong.” But what he is quick or strong about depends on his kind of relatedness, his character. If he is a productive, just, loving person he will react quickly and strongly when he loves, when he is enraged by injustice, and when he is impressed by a new idea. If he is a destructive or sadistic character, he will be quick and strong in his destructiveness or in his cruelty. The confusion between temperament and character has had serious consequences for ethical theory. Preferences with regard to differences in temperament are mere matters of subjective taste. But differences in character are ethically of the most fundamental importance.

Tom Robbins photo
Agnes Repplier photo
David Mamet photo
Jean Dubuffet photo

Related topics