Source: Power Without Property, 1959, p. 73; As cited in: Martin Sicker (2002) The Political Economy of Work in the 21st Century. p. 144.
“The systems advocated by professed upholders of laissez-faire are in reality permeated with coercive restrictions of individual freedom…. What is the government doing when it “protects a property right”? Passively, it is abstaining from interference with the owner when he deals with the thing owned; actively, it is forcing the non-owner to desist from handling it, unless the owner consents. Yet Mr. Carver would have it that the government is merely preventing the non-owner from using force against the owner. This explanation is obviously at variance with the facts—for the non-owner is forbidden to handle the owner's property even where his handling of it involves no violence or force whatever…. In protecting property the government is doing something quite apart from merely keeping the peace. It is exerting coercion wherever that is necessary to protect each owner, not merely from violence, but also from peaceful infringement of his sole right to enjoy the thing owned.”
“Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sep., 1923), pp. 470-494
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Robert Lee Hale 1
American lawyer and economist 1884–1969Related quotes
Source: The Modern Corporation and Private Property. 1932/1967, p. 355
Source: The Culture of Make Believe (2003), p. 63
“Imperfections are attractive when their owners are happy with them.”
Source: This Is How: Surviving What You Think You Can't
It – How Churches and Leaders Can Get It and Keep It (2008, Zondervan)
Source: 2010s, Fateful Lightning: A New History of the Civil War and Reconstruction (2012), Chapter One
As quoted in Mirrors: Stories of Almost Everyone (2009), p. 7
2000s, The Real Abraham Lincoln: A Debate (2002), The Right of Secession Is Not the Right of Revolution