"Charles Dickens" (1939)
Context: Dickens's attitude is easily intelligible to an Englishman, because it is part of the English puritan tradition, which is not dead even at this day. The class Dickens belonged to, at least by adoption, was growing suddenly rich after a couple of centuries of obscurity. It had grown up mainly in the big towns, out of contact with agriculture, and politically impotent; government, in its experience, was something which either interfered or persecuted. Consequently it was a class with no tradition of public service and not much tradition of usefulness. What now strikes us as remarkable about the new moneyed class of the nineteenth century is their complete irresponsibility; they see everything in terms of individual success, with hardly any consciousness that the community exists.
“The black middle-class in America is a prosperous community that is now larger in absolute terms than the black underclass. Does its existence not suggest that economic adversity is the result of failures of individual character rather than the lingering after-effects of racial discrimination and a slave system that ceased to exist well over a century ago?”
[David, Horowitz, http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1153, Ten Reasons Why Reparations for Blacks is a Bad Idea for Blacks - and Racist Too, FrontPageMagazine.com, January 3, 2001, 2007-02-17]
2001
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
David Horowitz 17
Neoconservative activist, writer 1939Related quotes
2008, A More Perfect Union (March 2008)
The Morals of Economic Irrationalism (1920)
As quoted in The United States Chess Federation profile http://main.uschess.org/content/view/142/195
Interview with Joseph Pearce, Sr. (2003)
Context: The thing is that religion itself cannot but be dynamic which is why "return" is an incorrect term. A return to the forms of religion which perhaps existed a couple of centuries ago is absolutely impossible. On the contrary, in order to combat modern materialistic mores, as religion must, to fight nihilism and egotism, religion must also develop, must be flexible in its forms, and it must have a correlation with the cultural forms of the epoch. Religion always remains higher than everyday life. In order to make the elevation towards religion easier for people, religion must be able to alter its forms in relation to the consciousness of modern man.