Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), p. 30
“Historically, it may be useful to fancy playfulness and piety as being the respective residues of the aristocratic and priestly backgrounds of the intellectual function. The element of play seems to be rooted in the ethos of the leisure class, which has always been central in the history of creative imagination and humanistic learning. The element of piety is reminiscent of the priestly inheritance of the intellectuals: the quest for and the possession of truth was a holy office. As their legatee, the modern intellectual inherits the vulnerability of the aristocrat to the animus of Puritanism and egalitarianism and the vulnerability of the priest to anticlericalism and popular assaults upon hierarchy. We need not be surprised, then, if the intellectual’s position has rarely been comfortable in a country which is, above all others, the home of the democrat and the antinomian.”
Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), pp. 32-33
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Richard Hofstadter 34
American historian 1916–1970Related quotes
Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), p. 30
Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), p. 33
Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), p. 27
“Intellectualism, though by no means confined to doubters, is often the sole piety of the skeptic.”
Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), p. 28
Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), p. 31
Source: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (1974), p. 29

In:P.245.
Commissions and Omissions by Indian Presidents and Their Conflicts with the Prime Ministers Under the Constitution: 1977-2001