Source: Striking Thoughts (2000), p. 16 
Context: In Science we have finally come back to the pre-Socratic philosopher Heraclitus, who said everything is flow, flux, process. There are no "things." NOTHINGNESS in Eastern language is "no-thingness". We in the West think of nothingness as a void, an emptiness, an nonexistence. In Eastern philosophy and modern physical science, nothingness — no-thingness — is a form of process, ever moving.
                                    
“Several leading-edge thinkers in physics suggest that nature is… a flux of processes. The whole notion of flux and process is fundamental to the Indigenous sciences of… Algonkian-speaking peoples… all share a strongly verb-based family of languages that reflects this direct experience.”
The Blackfoot Physics (2006)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
F. David Peat 14
British physicist 1938–2017Related quotes
Source: In Defense of Chaos: The Chaology of Politics, Economics and Human Action, (2013), p. 335
Talk at the 50th anniversary of New Scientist magazine (2006).
Five Essays on Liberty (2002), Historical Inevitability (1954)
                                        
                                        Academy of Achievement interview (1991) 
Context: I speak about universal evolution and teleological evolution, because I think the process of evolution reflects the wisdom of nature. I see the need for wisdom to become operative. We need to try to put all of these things together in what I call an evolutionary philosophy of our time.
                                    
Source: Psyche and Matter (1992), p. 208
                                        
                                        Introduction: an evolutionary riddle, p. 11 
In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion (2002)
                                    
                                        
                                        Dissent, Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U.S. 393 (1932). 
Judicial opinions 
Context: Stare decisis is usually the wise policy, because in most matters it is more important that the applicable rule of law be settled than that it be settled right... This is commonly true even where the error is a matter of serious concern, provided correction can be had by legislation. But in cases involving the Federal Constitution, where correction through legislative action is practically impossible, this court has often overruled its earlier decisions. The court bows to the lessons of experience and the force of better reasoning, recognizing that the process of trial and error, so fruitful in the physical sciences, is appropriate also in the judicial function.