“Modern Romans insisted that there was only one god, a notion that struck Alobar as comically simplistic.”

Jitterbug Perfume (1984)

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Modern Romans insisted that there was only one god, a notion that struck Alobar as comically simplistic." by Tom Robbins?
Tom Robbins photo
Tom Robbins 250
American writer 1932

Related quotes

Friedrich Hölderlin photo

“Being at one is god-like and good, but human, too human, the mania
Which insists there is only the One, one country, one truth, and one way.”

Friedrich Hölderlin (1770–1843) German poet

"The Root of All Evil" as translated by Michael Hamburger

Vladimir Nabokov photo

“Only one letter divides the comic from the cosmic.”

Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977) Russian-American novelist, lepidopterist, professor
Italo Svevo photo

“The great modern novel of the comic-pathetic illusion of freedom is Confessions of Zeno.”

Italo Svevo (1861–1928) Italian writer

James Wood in London Review of Books, January 3, 2002. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v24/n01/wood02_.html.
Criticism

Ambrose Bierce photo
Simone Weil photo

“There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.”

Simone Weil (1909–1943) French philosopher, Christian mystic, and social activist

As quoted in The New Christianity (1967) edited by William Robert Miller

Joyce Kilmer photo

“They shall not live who have not tasted death.
They only sing who are struck dumb by God.”

"Poets"
Trees and Other Poems (1914)
Context: p>Vain is the chiming of forgotten bells
That the wind sways above a ruined shrine.
Vainer his voice in whom no longer dwells
Hunger that craves immortal Bread and Wine. Light songs we breathe that perish with our breath
Out of our lips that have not kissed the rod.
They shall not live who have not tasted death.
They only sing who are struck dumb by God.</p

Saki photo
Rousas John Rushdoony photo

“Justice is closely connected to respect for rights. Modern writers discuss both subjects together with no suggestion that one might discuss one with the other. It was not always so. Greek political theory and Roman Law had sophisticated ideas about justice in its various aspects, but did not embrace our conception of individual rights. This may seem counter-intuitive. How could a society recognize someone as the owner of a piece of property without acknowledging an individual right? How does legitimate one-man­ rule, monarchy, differ from its illegitimate parody, tyranny, unless the lawful king has a right to the authority he exercises that the tyrant does not?
The answer is that property and authority were defined by law rather than our notion of individual rights. To own property was to be the person to whom the law accorded the privileges and immunities that locally defined ownership. To be a legitimate ruler was to be the person the law designated to rule. It is a commonplace that ancient notions of law accorded far more power over property to the family and other groups than modern notions of private property do. Even under the Roman Law, where ownership had an 'absolute' and sovereign character, property was not understood in the modern way; when the law told the judge to give a man his ius, this primarily meant that he should be treated as the law required. The 'subjective' understanding of rights, whereby the right-holder may stand on his rights or not as he chooses, was not a Roman notion.”

Alan Ryan (1940) British philosopher

Justice (1993)

Miguel de Unamuno photo

“For the mockers are those who die comically, and God laughs at their comic ending, while the nobler part, the part of tragedy, is theirs who endured the mockery.”

Miguel de Unamuno (1864–1936) 19th-20th century Spanish writer and philosopher

The Tragic Sense of Life (1913), Conclusion : Don Quixote in the Contemporary European Tragi-Comedy

Related topics