The trial of Charles B. Reynolds for blasphemy (1887)
Context: We have now a science called astronomy. That science has done more to enlarge the horizon of human thought than all things else. We now live in an infinite universe. We know that the sun is a million times larger than our earth, and we know that there are other great luminaries millions of times larger than our sun. We know that there are planets so far away that light, traveling at the rate of one hundred and eighty- five thousand miles a second, requires fifteen thousand years to reach this grain of sand, this tear, we call the earth -- and we now know that all the fields of space are sown thick with constellations. If that statute had been enforced, that science would not now be the property of the human mind. That science is contrary to the Bible, and for asserting the truth you become a criminal. For what sum of money, for what amount of wealth, would the world have the science of astronomy expunged from the brain of man? We learned the story of the stars in spite of that statute.
“Science popularization involves information about science explaining the things and their implications in detail, or any beliefs the reader might have and also tell them about the newer discoveries so as to enlarge the persons horizons.”
On his approach to science popularization
An Exclusive Interview with Prof. Jayant Vishnu Narlikar
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Jayant Narlikar 36
Indian physicist 1938Related quotes
Science in the Dock, Discussion with Noam Chomsky, Lawrence Krauss & Sean M. Carroll (2011), 2, Chomsky.info, March 1, 2006, August 16, 2011 http://www.chomsky.info/debates/20060301.htm,
Quotes 2010s, 2011
Psychology and Religion: West and East (1958), p. 476, as cited in Psychotherapy East and West (1961), p. 14
The Discover Interview: Lisa Randall (July 2006)
Introduction, p. xix.
What Is This Thing Called Science? (Third Edition; 1999)
Discussion, Fox News Sunday, February 16, 2014
2010s