“Times are ripe to discuss about the vote right, at least on an administrative level, for immigrant persons.”

Corriere della Sera, Fini: diamo il diritto di voto agli immigrati http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Politica/2003/10_Ottobre/07/fini.shtml, 7 October 2003.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Times are ripe to discuss about the vote right, at least on an administrative level, for immigrant persons." by Gianfranco Fini?
Gianfranco Fini photo
Gianfranco Fini 14
Italian politician 1952

Related quotes

Christopher Monckton photo
Huey Long photo

“Whenever this administration has gone to the left I have voted for it, and whenever it has gone to the right I have voted against it.”

Huey Long (1893–1935) American politician, Governor of Louisiana, and United States Senator

Huey Long on the new deal. (Williams p. 708)

Ann Coulter photo

“If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.”

Ann Coulter (1961) author, political commentator

interview with New York Observer 2007-10-02, quoted in * Coulter: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president"
Media Matters for America
2007-10-04
http://mediamatters.org/research/200710040011
2007

Jacob Rees-Mogg photo
Hillary Clinton photo

“I voted numerous times when I was a Senator to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in.”

Hillary Clinton (1947) American politician, senator, Secretary of State, First Lady

Town hall event at a high school in Windham; transcript: "Clinton: ‘You Have to Control Your Borders’" http://latinousa.org/2015/11/09/clinton-you-have-to-control-your-borders-video/ by Julio Ricardo Varela, Latino USA (9 November 2015)
Presidential campaign (April 12, 2015 – 2016)

Ha-Joon Chang photo

“Unlike what neo-liberals say, market and democracy clash at a fundamental level. Democracy runs on the principle of 'one man (one person), one vote'. The market runs on the principle of 'one dollar, one vote'.”

Source: Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism (2008), Ch. 8, Democracy and the free market, p. 172
Context: Unlike what neo-liberals say, market and democracy clash at a fundamental level. Democracy runs on the principle of 'one man (one person), one vote'. The market runs on the principle of 'one dollar, one vote'. Naturally, the former gives equal weight to each person, regardless of the money she/he has. The latter give greater weight to richer people. Therefore, democratic decisions usually subvert the logic of market.

Bernard Baruch photo

“Vote for the man who promises least; he'll be the least disappointing.”

Bernard Baruch (1870–1965) American businessman

As quoted in Meyer Berger’s New York (1960)

Henrik Ibsen photo

“The State has its root in time, and will ripe and rot in time.”

Henrik Ibsen (1828–1906) Norwegian playwright, theatre director, and poet

Letter to Georg Brandes (17 February 1871), as translated in Henrik Ibsen : Björnstjerne Björnson. Critical Studies (1899) by Georg Morris Cohen Brandes
Variant translation: The quality of liberty is that, as long as it is being striven after, it goes on expanding. Therefore, the man who stands still in the midst of the struggle and says: "I have it," merely shows by so doing that he has lost it. Now this very contentedness in the possession of a dead liberty is a characteristic of the so-called state; and it is worthless.
As translated in Ibsen : The Man, His Art & His Significance (1907) by Haldane Macfall, p. 238
Variant translation: Neither moral concepts nor art forms can expect to live forever. How much are we obliged to hold on to? Who can guarantee that 2 plus 2 don't add up to 5 on Jupiter?
Context: He who possesses liberty otherwise than as an aspiration possesses it soulless, dead. One of the qualities of liberty is that, as long as it is being striven after, it goes on expanding. Therefore, the man who stands still in the midst of the struggle and says, "I have it," merely shows by so doing that he has just lost it. Now this very contentedness in the possession of a dead liberty is characteristic of the so-called State, and, as I have said, it is not a good characteristic. No doubt the franchise, self-taxation, etc., are benefits — but to whom? To the citizen, not to the individual. Now, reason does not imperatively demand that the individual should be a citizen. Far from it. The State is the curse of the individual. With what is Prussia's political strength bought? With the absorption of the individual in the political and geographical idea. The waiter is the best soldier. And on the other hand, take the Jewish people, the aristocracy of the human race — how is it they have kept their place apart, their poetical halo, amid surroundings of coarse cruelty? By having no State to burden them. Had they remained in Palestine, they would long ago have lost their individuality in the process of their State's construction, like all other nations. Away with the State! I will take part in that revolution. Undermine the whole conception of a State, declare free choice and spiritual kinship to be the only all-important conditions of any union, and you will have the commencement of a liberty that is worth something. Changes in forms of government are pettifogging affairs — a degree less or a degree more, mere foolishness. The State has its root in time, and will ripe and rot in time. Greater things than it will fall — religion, for example. Neither moral conceptions nor art-forms have an eternity before them. How much are we really in duty bound to pin our faith to? Who will guarantee me that on Jupiter two and two do not make five?

Starhawk photo

Related topics