“Simon Wiesenthal told me that any political party in a democracy that uses the word 'freedom' in its name is either Nazi or Communist.”

Robert D. Kaplan, Balkan Ghosts http://books.google.com/books?id=7zx8HswRGmMC&pg=PR53&ots=7w-fGL9HLu, p. liii

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Simon Wiesenthal told me that any political party in a democracy that uses the word 'freedom' in its name is either Naz…" by Robert D. Kaplan?
Robert D. Kaplan photo
Robert D. Kaplan 4
American writer 1952

Related quotes

Fyodor Dan photo
Martin Lee photo

“The Communist Party is fully in charge and they give however much freedom they want to give and can take it away any time they like…”

Martin Lee (1938) Hong Kong politician

Exclusive: Beijing completely broke their promise on Hong Kong, says veteran democrat Martin Lee

Konrad Heiden photo

“The Nazi party had been too hasty in incorporating the word ‘Socialist’ in its title, Hitler indeed wished it to be ‘Social Revolutionary.”

Konrad Heiden (1901–1966) German journalist and historian

Source: A History of National Socialism (1934), p. 85

Silvio Berlusconi photo

“Churchill liberated us from the Nazis, Silvio Berlusconi is liberating us from communists.”

Silvio Berlusconi (1936) Italian politician

Speech in Ancona (11 February 2006), as quoted in "Did I say This? in The Observer (20 April 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/apr/20/italy
2006

George Grosz photo

“Yes, [to] the Communist party! [the presiding judge asked Grosz: 'Do you belong to a political party?']”

George Grosz (1893–1959) German artist

In newspaper 'Frankfurter Zeitung', 4 Dec. 1930, second morning edition [copy, in the 'Archive of the National-Galerie', East Berlin])
the statement in this German newspaper reports of the case, brought against Grosz for 'blasphemy', over his portfolio of prints: 'Hintergrund' (Background)

Götz Aly photo

“Another source of the Nazi Party’s popularity was its liberal borrowing from the intellectual tradition of the socialist left. Many of the men who would become the movement’s leaders had been involved in communist and socialist circles.”

Götz Aly (1947) German journalist, historian and social scientist

Source: Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State (2007), p. 16

Dorothy Thompson photo
Roger Nash Baldwin photo

“The Nazi-Soviet pact of 1939, a traumatic shock to me, ended any ambivalence I had about the Soviet Union, and all cooperation with Communists in united fronts.”

Roger Nash Baldwin (1884–1981) American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) co-founder

[Liberties Lost: The Endangered Legacy of the ACLU, Baldwin, Roger, 0275985067, 1971, 2006, Woody Klein, The Roger Baldwin Story: A Prejudiced Account By Himself, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT, 11, http://books.google.com/books?id=EsJinpB3XYsC&pg=PA11]

Richard Stallman photo

“While free software by any other name would give you the same freedom, it makes a big difference which name we use: different words convey different ideas.”

Richard Stallman (1953) American software freedom activist, short story writer and computer programmer, founder of the GNU project

1990s, Why "Free Software" is better than "Open Source" (1998)
Context: While free software by any other name would give you the same freedom, it makes a big difference which name we use: different words convey different ideas.
In 1998, some of the people in the free software community began using the term "open source software" instead of "free software" to describe what they do. The term "open source" quickly became associated with a different approach, a different philosophy, different values, and even a different criterion for which licenses are acceptable. The Free Software movement and the Open Source movement are today separate movements with different views and goals, although we can and do work together on some practical projects.
The fundamental difference between the two movements is in their values, their ways of looking at the world. For the Open Source movement, the issue of whether software should be open source is a practical question, not an ethical one. As one person put it, "Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement." For the Open Source movement, non-free software is a suboptimal solution. For the Free Software movement, non-free software is a social problem and free software is the solution.

Related topics