Source: The Myth of Male Power (1993), Part II: The Glass Cellars of the disposable sex, p. 228.
“The one-sided funding creates one-sided images that reinforce the press defining as progress an examination of only women’s issues. Thus, a quarter century’s-worth of studies showing domestic violence against men to be more than equal to domestic violence against women receive so little publicity as to barely make a dent on the public’s consciousness.”
Source: Father and Child Reunion (2001), p. 241.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Do you have more details about the quote "The one-sided funding creates one-sided images that reinforce the press defining as progress an examination of only wom…" by Warren Farrell?
Warren Farrell 467
author, spokesperson, expert witness, political candidate 1943Related quotes
Camille Paglia
(1947) American writer
Source: Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson (1990), p. 235
Catharine A. MacKinnon
(1946) American feminist and legal activist
Sexuality, Pornography, and Method: "Pleasure under Patriarchy" (1989) Ethics, Vol. 99, No. 2 pp. 314-346
Elizabeth Martinez
(1925) American community organizer, activist, author, and educator
De Colores Means All of Us: Latina Views for a Multi-Colored Century (2017)
Tawakkol Karman
(1979) Yemeni journalist, politician, human rights activist, and Nobel Peace Prize recipient
2000s, Youth Q&A on the U.N. High-Level Panel on the Post-2015 Agenda Report (2009)
Francis Escudero
(1969) Filipino politician
Escudero, F. [Francis]. (2016, March 8). Retrieved from Official Facebook Page of Francis Escudero https://www.facebook.com/senchizescudero/posts/10153923936700610/
2016, Facebook
Source: The Myth of Male Power (1993), Part III: Government as substitute husband, p. 288.
Source: The Myth of Male Power (1993), Part 1: The Myth of Male Power, p. 75.
: The Foundations of Liberal Policy § 10. The Argument of Fascism https://mises.org/liberal/ch1sec10.asp,Ch.1
Liberalism (1927)
Context: Now it cannot be denied that the only way one can offer effective resistance to violent assaults is by violence. Against the weapons of the Bolsheviks, weapons must be used in reprisal, and it would be a mistake to display weakness before murderers. No liberal has ever called this into question. What distinguishes liberal from Fascist political tactics is not a difference of opinion in regard to the necessity of using armed force to resist armed attackers, but a difference in the fundamental estimation of the role of violence in a struggle for power. The great danger threatening domestic policy from the side of Fascism lies in its complete faith in the decisive power of violence. In order to assure success, one must be imbued with the will to victory and always proceed violently. This is its highest principle. What happens, however, when one's opponent, similarly animated by the will to be victorious, acts just as violently? The result must be a battle, a civil war. The ultimate victor to emerge from such conflicts will be the faction strongest in number. In the long run, a minority — even if it is composed of the most capable and energetic — cannot succeed in resisting the majority. The decisive question, therefore, always remains: How does one obtain a majority for one's own party? This, however, is a purely intellectual matter. It is a victory that can be won only with the weapons of the intellect, never by force. The suppression of all opposition by sheer violence is a most unsuitable way to win adherents to one's cause. Resort to naked force — that is, without justification in terms of intellectual arguments accepted by public opinion — merely gains new friends for those whom one is thereby trying to combat. In a battle between force and an idea, the latter always prevails.