“To suppose such a thing possible as a society, in which men, who are able and willing to work, cannot support their families, and ought, with a great part of the women, to be compelled to lead a life of celibacy, for fear of having children to be starved; to suppose such a thing possible is monstrous.”

p 7
Wonderful, Wonderful Times (1990)

Quoted in The Last Word (1992) edited by Carolyn Warner

Source: The Sweet Far Thing

AMA on Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/4zlf89/lauren_southern_ama/d6wtbfx/ (August 25, 2016)

1950s, What Desires Are Politically Important? (1950)

A Man Without a Country (2005)
Context: Socialism is no more an evil word than Christianity. Socialism no more prescribed Joseph Stalin and his secret police and shuttered churches than Christianity prescribed the Spanish Inquisition. Christianity and socialism alike, in fact, prescribe a society dedicated to the proposition that all men, women, and children are created equal and shall not starve.

Source: Father and Child Reunion (2001), p. 163.

Pa. ranks poorly in women holding public office, but York County 'a different story' https://www.eveningsun.com/story/news/2018/02/22/pa-ranks-poorly-women-holding-public-office-but-york-county-different-story/332822002/ (22 February 2018)

The Conquest of Bread (1907), p. 14 http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/kropotkin/conquest/toc.html<br>Variant: All things for all men, since all men have need of them, since all men worked to produce them in the measure of their strength, and since it is not possible to evaluate everyone&#x27;s part in the production of the world&#x27;s wealth... All is for all!<br>This variant was probably produced by a combination of accidental as well as deliberate omission, rather than a separate translation. <br class="br">Context: The means of production being the collective work of humanity, the product should be the collective property of the race. Individual appropriation is neither just nor serviceable. All belongs to all. All things are for all men, since all men have need of them, since all men have worked in the measure of their strength to produce them, and since it is not possible to evaluate every one&#x27;s part in the production of the world&#x27;s wealth.<br>All things are for all. Here is an immense stock of tools and implements; here are all those iron slaves which we call machines, which saw and plane, spin and weave for us, unmaking and remaking, working up raw matter to produce the marvels of our time. But nobody has the right to seize a single one of these machines and say, &quot;This is mine; if you want to use it you must pay me a tax on each of your products,&quot; any more than the feudal lord of medieval times had the right to say to the peasant, &quot;This hill, this meadow belong to me, and you must pay me a tax on every sheaf of corn you reap, on every rick you build.&quot;<br>All is for all! If the man and the woman bear their fair share of work, they have a right to their fair share of all that is produced by all, and that share is enough to secure them well-being. No more of such vague formulas as &quot;The Right to work,&quot; or &quot;To each the whole result of his labour.&quot; What we proclaim is The Right to Well-Being: Well-Being for All!