David Rockefeller (1915–2017) American banker and philanthropist
In an interview with Benjamin Fulford (13 November 2007) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3704527408635856046
New Scientist interview (2004)
David Rockefeller (1915–2017) American banker and philanthropist
In an interview with Benjamin Fulford (13 November 2007) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3704527408635856046
Howard P. Robertson (1903–1961) American mathematician and physicist
Geometry as a Branch of Physics (1949)
Jesse Ventura (1951) American politician and former professional wrestler
I Ain't Got Time To Bleed (1999)
“rules exist for a reason. Rules exist because when people don't follow them, people get hurt.”
Ally Carter book Don't Judge a Girl by Her Cover
Source: Don't Judge a Girl by Her Cover
Geoffrey West (1940) British physicist
2010s <br class="br">Source: Jonah Lehredec. " A Physicist Solves the City http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/magazine/19Urban_West-t.html?pagewanted=5&_r=1," in www.nytimes.com. Dec 17, 2010.
“I cannot think of a single one, not even intelligence.”
Enrico Fermi (1901–1954) Italian physicist
When asked what characteristics Nobel prize winning physicists had in common. As quoted in Physics Today (October 1994), p. 70.
“Logic has borrowed, perhaps, the rules of geometry, without comprehending their force”
Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) French mathematician, physicist, inventor, writer, and Christian philosopher
The Art of Persuasion
Context: Logic has borrowed, perhaps, the rules of geometry, without comprehending their force... it does not thence follow that they have entered into the spirit of geometry, and I should be greatly averse... to placing them on a level with that science that teaches the true method of directing reason.
“If geometry exists, arithmetic must also needs be implied”
Nicomachus (60–120) Ancient Greek mathematician
Nicomachus of Gerasa: Introduction to Arithmetic (1926)
Context: If geometry exists, arithmetic must also needs be implied... But on the contrary 3, 4, and the rest might be 5 without the figures existing to which they give names. Hence arithmetic abolishes geometry along with itself, but is not abolished by it, and while it is implied by geometry, it does not itself imply geometry.<!--Book I, Chapter IV