Bertram Raven (1926) American psychologist
Source: "Influence, Power, Religion, and the Mechanisms of Social Control," 1999, p. 161
Source: "The bases of social power." 1959, p. 150
Bertram Raven (1926) American psychologist
Source: "Influence, Power, Religion, and the Mechanisms of Social Control," 1999, p. 161
Mao Zedong (1893–1976) Chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China
On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People
Kurt Lewin (1890–1947) German-American psychologist
Source: 1940s, Action research and minority problems, 1946, p. 35.
Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929–1968) American clergyman, activist, and leader in the American Civil Rights Movement
1960s, Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community? (1967)
Context: Power properly understood is nothing but the ability to achieve purpose. It is the strength required to bring about social, political and economic change. … Now a lot of us are preachers, and all of us have our moral convictions and concerns, and so often have problems with power. There is nothing wrong with power if power is used correctly. You see, what happened is that some of our philosophers got off base. And one of the great problems of history is that the concepts of love and power have usually been contrasted as opposites — polar opposites — so that love is identified with a resignation of power, and power with a denial of love.
It was this misinterpretation that caused Nietzsche, who was a philosopher of the will to power, to reject the Christian concept of love. It was this same misinterpretation which induced Christian theologians to reject the Nietzschean philosophy of the will to power in the name of the Christian idea of love. Now, we've got to get this thing right. What is needed is a realization that power without love is reckless and abusive, and love without power is sentimental and anemic. Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice, and justice at its best is power correcting everything that stands against love. And this is what we must see as we move on. What has happened is that we have had it wrong and confused in our own country, and this has led Negro Americans in the past to seek their goals through power devoid of love and conscience.
This is leading a few extremists today to advocate for Negroes the same destructive and conscienceless power that they have justly abhorred in whites. It is precisely this collision of immoral power with powerless morality which constitutes the major crisis of our times.
Kurt Danziger (1926) German academic
Source: Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. 1994, p. 88
Béla H. Bánáthy (1919–2003) Hungarian linguist and systems scientist
Béla H. Bánáthy (1985) Proceedings, Society for General Systems Research international. Vol 1. p. xxv
Trường Chinh (1907–1988) former General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam (1907-1988)
For the Centenary of Lenin’s Birth (1971) (excerpts)
Neil Fligstein (1951) American sociologist
Source: The transformation of corporate control, 1993, p. 300
“Unquestionably socialism and anarchism attract distinctly different types”
Robert Hunter (author) (1874–1942) American sociologist, author, golf course architect
Source: Violence and the Labor Movement (1914), p. 92
Context: Unquestionably socialism and anarchism attract distinctly different types, who are in many ways alien to each other. Their mental processes differ.
James Burnham (1905–1987) American philosopher
Source: The Managerial Revolution, 1941, p. 71; cited in: Robert Manley (ed) (1962) Age of the manager http://archive.org/stream/ageofmanager00manl#page/n15/mode/2up. p. xiii