“It is not sex that gives the pleasure, but the lover.”
Marge Piercy (1936) American novelist and poet
“Familiarity with your lover is what initially makes sex really good.”
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Do you have more details about the quote "Familiarity with your lover is what initially makes sex really good." by Susie Bright?
Susie Bright15
American writer and feminist 1958Related quotes
“Put down your hollow tips,
And kiss your lover's lips,
And know that fate is what we make of it.”
Brandon Boyd (1976) American rock singer, writer and visual artist
Lyrics, A Crow Left of the Murder... (2004)
“A book is really like a lover. It arranges itself in your life in a way that is beautiful.”
Maurice Sendak (1928–2012) American illustrator and writer of children's books
Vanna Bonta (1958–2014) Italian-American writer, poet, inventor, actress, voice artist (1958-2014)
Vanna Bonta Talks Sex in Space (Interview - Femail magazine)
Jason Biggs (1978) American actor
Interview with Larry Smith, basis for Bigg's character on the show Orange Is the New Black, interview excerpted in: — [December 4, 2014, http://popwatch.ew.com/2014/07/16/larry-smith-jason-biggs-orange-is-the-new-black/, Jason Biggs talks 'Orange is the New Black' with real-life Larry, Ariana Bacle, July 16, 2014, Entertainment Weekly]
Charles Baudelaire Le Peintre de la vie moderne
L'observateur est un prince qui jouit partout de son incognito. L'amateur de la vie fait du monde sa famille, comme l'amateur du beau sexe compose sa famille de toutes les beautés trouvées, trouvables et introuvables; comme l'amateur de tableaux vit dans une société enchantée de rêves peints sur toile.
III: "L'artiste, homme du monde, homme des foules et enfant"
Le peintre de la vie moderne (1863)
“Beauty soon grows familiar to the lover,
Fades in his eye, and palls upon the sense.”
Joseph Addison book Cato
Act I, scene iv.
Cato, A Tragedy (1713)
Erwin Schrödinger (1887–1961) Austrian physicist
"The Fundamental Idea of Wave Mechanics", Nobel lecture, (12 December 1933)
Context: Conditions are admittedly such that we can always manage to make do in each concrete individual case without the two different aspects leading to different expectations as to the result of certain experiments. We cannot, however, manage to make do with such old, familiar, and seemingly indispensable terms as "real" or "only possible"; we are never in a position to say what really is or what really happens, but we can only say what will be observed in any concrete individual case. Will we have to be permanently satisfied with this...? On principle, yes. On principle, there is nothing new in the postulate that in the end exact science should aim at nothing more than the description of what can really be observed. The question is only whether from now on we shall have to refrain from tying description to a clear hypothesis about the real nature of the world. There are many who wish to pronounce such abdication even today. But I believe that this means making things a little too easy for oneself.