Alan O. Ebenstein (1959) American political scientist, educator and author
Hayek's Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek (2003)
Hayek's Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek (2003)
Alan O. Ebenstein (1959) American political scientist, educator and author
Hayek's Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek (2003)
“The law of England is a law of liberty”
Edward Law, 1st Baron Ellenborough (1750–1818) Lord Chief Justice of England
R. v. Cobbett (1804), 29 How. St. Tr. 49.
Context: The law of England is a law of liberty, and, consistently with this liberty, we have not what is called an imprimatur (let it be printed); there is no such preliminary licence necessary. But if a man publish a paper, he is exposed to the penal consequences, as he is in every other act, if it be illegal.
Benjamin N. Cardozo (1870–1938) United States federal judge
p, 125
Other writings, The Paradoxes of Legal Science (1928)
Bernard Bailyn book The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution
Source: The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (1967), Chapter III, POWER AND LIBERTY A THEORY OF POLITICS, p. 57.
Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826) 3rd President of the United States of America
Letter to Isaac H. Tiffany (4 April 1819)
1810s
Henry Martyn Robert (1837–1923) United States Army general and Chief of Engineers
Robert's Rules of Order Revised, 1915, preface http://www.paulmcclintock.com/quotes.htm
William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield (1705–1793) British judge
Rex v. Wilkes (1769), 4 Burr. Part IV., p. 2563.
Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) British philosopher, jurist, and social reformer
Principles of Legislation (1830), Ch. X : Analysis of Political Good and Evil; How they are spread in society
Context: It is with government, as with medicine. They have both but a choice of evils. Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils: In making this choice, what ought to be the object of the legislator? He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them.
There are then two things to be regarded; the evil of the offence and the evil of the law; the evil of the malady and the evil of the remedy.
An evil comes rarely alone. A lot of evil cannot well fall upon an individual without spreading itself about him, as about a common centre. In the course of its progress we see it take different shapes: we see evil of one kind issue from evil of another kind; evil proceed from good and good from evil. All these changes, it is important to know and to distinguish; in this, in fact, consists the essence of legislation.
John R. Commons (1862–1945) United States institutional economist and labor historian
Source: Legal foundations of capitalism. 1924, p. 32