“Let us admit that no matter how small the chance it could happen, one molecule could be created by such astronomical odds of chance. However, one molecule is of no use. Hundreds of millions of identical ones are necessary. Thus we either admit the miracle or doubt the absolute truth of science.”

Human Destiny, 1947, p. 33
Commenting on Charles-Eugene Guye's calculation that the odds against the random formation of a particular protein molecule would be about 1 in 10 to the 243rd.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Let us admit that no matter how small the chance it could happen, one molecule could be created by such astronomical od…" by Pierre Lecomte du Noüy?
Pierre Lecomte du Noüy photo
Pierre Lecomte du Noüy 2
French philosopher 1883–1947

Related quotes

Ronald Fisher photo

“The million, million, million … to one chance happens once in a million, million, million … times no matter how surprised we may be that it results in us.”

Ronald Fisher (1890–1962) English statistician, evolutionary biologist, geneticist, and eugenicist

Quoted by K.Mather, Heredity 30, 89–91, 1973.
Since 1960s

James Jeans photo
Socrates photo
Cyrano de Bergerac photo

“You will say, 'How can chance assemble in one place all the things necessary to produce an oak tree?' My answer is that it would be no miracle if the matter thus arranged had not formed an oak. But it would have been a very great miracle if, once the matter was thus arranged, an oak had not been formed.”

Cyrano de Bergerac (1619–1655) French novelist, dramatist, scientist and duelist

The Other World (1657)
Context: You will say, 'How can chance assemble in one place all the things necessary to produce an oak tree?' My answer is that it would be no miracle if the matter thus arranged had not formed an oak. But it would have been a very great miracle if, once the matter was thus arranged, an oak had not been formed. A few less of some shapes, and it would have been an elm, a poplar, a willow, an elder, heather or moss. A little more of some other shapes and it might have been a sensitive plant, an oyster in its shell, a worm, a fly, a frog, a sparrow, an ape or a man.

Dorothy Hodgkin photo

“Would it not be better if one could really 'see' whether molecules…were just as experiments suggested?”

Dorothy Hodgkin (1910–1994) British chemist

the question that decided her to specialize in X-ray cristallography, as quoted by [Sharon Bertsch McGrayne, Nobel Prize women in science: their lives, struggles, and momentous discoveries, Joseph Henry Press, 1998, http://books.google.com/books?id=-PqK3zxkRrIC&pg=PA231, 0-309-07270-0, 231]

Arthur Leonard Schawlow photo

“A diatomic molecule is a molecule with one atom too many.”

Arthur Leonard Schawlow (1921–1999) American physicist

as quoted in [Dave DeMille, Diatomic molecules, a window onto fundamental physics, Physics Today, 2015, December, 34, 68, 12, 10.1063/PT.3.3020]

William Crookes photo

“Here we use the vibrations of the material molecules of the atmosphere to transmit intelligence from one brain to another.”

William Crookes (1832–1919) British chemist and physicist

Address to the Society for Psychical Research (1897)
Context: Ordinarily we communicate intelligence to each other by speech. I first call up in my own brain a picture of a scene I wish to describe, and then, by means of an orderly transmission of wave vibrations set in motion by my vocal chords through the material atmosphere, a corresponding picture is implanted in the brain of anyone whose ear is capable of receiving such vibrations. If the scene I wish to impress on the brain of the recipient is of a complicated character, or if the picture of it in my own brain is not definite, the transmission will be more or less imperfect; but if I wish to get my audience to picture to themselves some very simple object, such as a triangle or a circle, the transmission of ideas will be well-nigh perfect, and equally clear to the brains of both transmitter and recipient. Here we use the vibrations of the material molecules of the atmosphere to transmit intelligence from one brain to another.

Roald Dahl photo
Ellen DeGeneres photo
Erwin Schrödinger photo

“we never experiment with just one electron or atom or (small) molecule. In thought-experiments we sometimes assume that we do.”

Erwin Schrödinger (1887–1961) Austrian physicist

ARE THERE QUANTUM JUMPS ? PART II(1952)

Related topics