“Capitalism is about the mutual creation of wealth rather than the pillaging of it.”

—  Ted Malloch

Source: Doing Virtuous Business (Thomas Nelson, 2011), p. 29.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Capitalism is about the mutual creation of wealth rather than the pillaging of it." by Ted Malloch?
Ted Malloch photo
Ted Malloch 36
American businessman 1952

Related quotes

“The world economy diffuses rather than concentrates wealth.”

Robert Gilpin (1930–2018) Political scientist

Source: The Political Economy of International Relations (1987), Chapter Three, Dynamics Of Political Economy, p. 85

David McNally photo

“Globalization is thus also about global commodification of labour; it is about — global proletarianization — the creation of a world working class for capital to exploit.”

David McNally (1953) Canadian political scientist

Source: Another World Is Possible : Globalization and Anti-capitalism (2002), Chapter 3, The Invisible Hand Is A Closed Fist, p. 78

Pliny the Younger photo

“The lust of lucre has so totally seized upon mankind, that their wealth seems rather to possess them, than they to possess their wealth.”
Ea invasit homines habendi cupido, ut possideri magis quam possidere videantur.

Pliny the Younger (61–113) Roman writer

Letter 30, 4.
Letters, Book IX

James A. Garfield photo

“I would rather be defeated than make capital out of my religion.”

James A. Garfield (1831–1881) American politician, 20th President of the United States (in office in 1881)

Source: 1880s, Garfield's Words (1882)

William Morris photo

“No pillager or wrecker had been there;
It seemed that time had passed on otherwhere,
Nor laid a finger on this hidden place
Rich with the wealth of some forgotten race.”

William Morris (1834–1896) author, designer, and craftsman

The Earthly Paradise (1868-70), The Lady of the Land

“No decision in business provides greater potential for the creation of wealth (or its destruction, come to think of it) than the choice of which innovation to back.”

Robert Heller (1932–2012) British magician

Source: The Decision makers (1989), Ch. 5. The Innovators’

Anton Chekhov photo

“To describe drunkenness for the colorful vocabulary is rather cynical. There is nothing easier than to capitalize on drunkards.”

Anton Chekhov (1860–1904) Russian dramatist, author and physician

Letter to N.A. Leikin (December 24, 1886)
Letters

Newton Lee photo

“Creationism and evolution are not mutually exclusive. In fact, the former gives rise to the latter.”

Newton Lee American computer scientist

The Transhumanism Handbook, 2019

Pierre Joseph Proudhon photo
Karl Marx photo

“The development of fixed capital indicates in still another respect the degree of development of wealth generally, or of capital…”

Notebook VII, The Chapter on Capital, pp. 628–629.
Grundrisse (1857/58)
Context: The development of fixed capital indicates in still another respect the degree of development of wealth generally, or of capital…
The creation of a large quantity of disposable time apart from necessary labour time for society generally and each of its members (i. e. room for the development of the individuals’ full productive forces, hence those of society also), this creation of not-labour time appears in the stage of capital, as of all earlier ones, as not-labour time, free time, for a few. What capital adds is that it increases the surplus labour time of the mass by all the means of art and science, because its wealth consists directly in the appropriation of surplus labour time; since value directly its purpose, not use value. It is thus, despite itself, instrumental in creating the means of social disposable time, in order to reduce labour time for the whole society to a diminishing minimum, and thus to free everyone’s time for their own development. But its tendency always, on the one side, to create disposable time, on the other, to convert it into surplus labour...
The mass of workers must themselves appropriate their own surplus labour. Once they have done so – and disposable time thereby ceases to have an antithetical existence – then, on one side, necessary labour time will be measured by the needs of the social individual, and, on the other, the development of the power of social production will grow so rapidly that, even though production is now calculated for the wealth of all, disposable time will grow for all. For real wealth is the developed productive power of all individuals. The measure of wealth is then not any longer, in any way, labour time, but rather disposable time. Labour time as the measure of value posits wealth itself as founded on poverty, and disposable time as existing in and because of the antithesis to surplus labour time; or, the positing of an individual’s entire time as labour time, and his degradation therefore to mere worker, subsumption under labour. The most developed machinery thus forces the worker to work longer than the savage does, or than he himself did with the simplest, crudest tools.

Related topics