Source: The Book of Nothing (2009), chapter nought "Nothingology—Flying to Nowhere"
“It must be admitted that among a certain number of advanced mathematical physicists whose work has lain mainly in the twentieth century, the ether is regarded with suspicion, or even with contempt. And some of the opponents go so far as to as to say that the nineteenth century idea of the ether has failed to establish itself, and that in consequence the whole idea of the ether is under a cloud, and that it is only upheld by a few antiquated supporters, who, though are willing to admit many modifications in the original nineteenth century notions of an ether, feel the need of a medium capable of performing the functions attributed to it.”
             My Philosophy: Representing My Views on the Many Functions of the Ether of Space, p. 109 https://books.google.com/books?id=pC28TnExGEEC&pg=PA109 
My Philosophy (1933)
        
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Oliver Lodge 19
British physicist 1851–1940Related quotes
                                        
                                        As quoted in Saul Leiter (2008) by Agnès Sire 
Context: I must admit that I am not a member of the ugly school. I have a great regard for certain notions of beauty even though to some it is an old fashioned idea. Some photographers think that by taking pictures of human misery, they are addressing a serious problem. I do not think that misery is more profound than happiness.
                                    
                                        
                                        Source: Science and Hypothesis (1901), Ch. I: On the Nature of Mathematical Reasoning (1905)  Tr. https://books.google.com/books?id=5nQSAAAAYAAJ George Bruce Halstead 
Context: The very possibility of the science of mathematics seems an insoluble contradiction. If this science is deductive only in appearance, whence does it derive that perfect rigor no one dreams of doubting? If, on the contrary, all the propositions it enunciates can be deduced one from another by the rules of formal logic, why is not mathematics reduced to an immense tautology? The syllogism can teach us nothing essentially new, and, if everything is to spring from the principle of identity, everything should be capable of being reduced to it. Shall we then admit that the enunciations of all those theorems which fill so many volumes are nothing but devious ways of saying A is A!... Does the mathematical method proceed from particular to the general, and, if so, how can it be called deductive?... If we refuse to admit these consequences, it must be conceded that mathematical reasoning has of itself a sort of creative virtue and consequently differs from a syllogism.<!--pp.5-6
                                    
                                        
                                        Martin Seymour-Smith Guide to Modern World Literature (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1975) vol. 3, p. 30. 
Criticism
                                    
Quoted in Life of Lord Kelvin (1910) by Silvanus Phillips Thompson
                                        
                                         My Philosophy, p. 125 https://books.google.com/books?id=pC28TnExGEEC&pg=PA115 
My Philosophy (1933)
                                    
Source: Presidential Address British Association for the Advancement of Science, Section A (1910), p. 283; Cited in: Moritz (1914, 108-9): Modern mathematics.
“The nineteenth century believed in science but the twentieth century does not.”
Wars I Have Seen (1945)