“In general, scientific progress calls for no more than the absorption and elaboration of new ideas — and this is a call most scientists are happy to heed.”

Physics and Beyond : Encounters and Conversation (1971)

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "In general, scientific progress calls for no more than the absorption and elaboration of new ideas — and this is a call…" by Werner Heisenberg?
Werner Heisenberg photo
Werner Heisenberg 42
German theoretical physicist 1901–1976

Related quotes

Charles Edward Merriam photo

“The technical apparatus of modem organization is far more complicated, elaborate, and scientific than that of preceding generations.”

Charles Edward Merriam (1874–1953) American political scientist

Source: Systematic Politics, 1943, p. 150-1 ; as cited in Albert Lepawsky (1949), Administration, p. 220-1

Paul Karl Feyerabend photo
Stanley Knowles photo

“All told it is a new world. It calls for new ideas. In Canada it calls for a New Party.”

Stanley Knowles (1908–1997) Canadian politician

Source: The New Party - (1961), Chapter 7, Program, p. 83

“Scientists are typically good at making scientific progress, but not particularly good at articulating what the progress consists of.”

Source: What Is This Thing Called Science? (Third Edition; 1999), Chapter 16, Epilogue, p. 252.

Leo Tolstoy photo

“These new justifications are termed "scientific". But by the term "scientific" is understood just what was formerly understood by the term "religious": just as formerly everything called "religious" was held to be unquestionable simply because it was called religious, so now all that is called "scientific" is held to be unquestionable.”

Source: A Letter to a Hindu (1908), IV
Context: These new justifications are termed "scientific". But by the term "scientific" is understood just what was formerly understood by the term "religious": just as formerly everything called "religious" was held to be unquestionable simply because it was called religious, so now all that is called "scientific" is held to be unquestionable. In the present case the obsolete religious justification of violence which consisted in the recognition of the supernatural personality of the God-ordained ruler ("there is no power but of God") has been superseded by the "scientific" justification which puts forward, first, the assertion that because the coercion of man by man has existed in all ages, it follows that such coercion must continue to exist. This assertion that people should continue to live as they have done throughout past ages rather than as their reason and conscience indicate, is what "science" calls "the historic law". A further "scientific" justification lies in the statement that as among plants and wild beasts there is a constant struggle for existence which always results in the survival of the fittest, a similar struggle should be carried on among human­beings, that is, who are gifted with intelligence and love; faculties lacking in the creatures subject to the struggle for existence and survival of the fittest. Such is the second "scientific" justification. The third, most important, and unfortunately most widespread justification is, at bottom, the age-old religious one just a little altered: that in public life the suppression of some for the protection of the majority cannot be avoided — so that coercion is unavoidable however desirable reliance on love alone might be in human intercourse. The only difference in this justification by pseudo-science consists in the fact that, to the question why such and such people and not others have the right to decide against whom violence may and must be used, pseudo-science now gives a different reply to that given by religion — which declared that the right to decide was valid because it was pronounced by persons possessed of divine power. "Science" says that these decisions represent the will of the people, which under a constitutional form of government is supposed to find expression in all the decisions and actions of those who are at the helm at the moment. Such are the scientific justifications of the principle of coercion. They are not merely weak but absolutely invalid, yet they are so much needed by those who occupy privileged positions that they believe in them as blindly as they formerly believed in the immaculate conception, and propagate them just as confidently. And the unfortunate majority of men bound to toil is so dazzled by the pomp with which these "scientific truths" are presented, that under this new influence it accepts these scientific stupidities for holy truth, just as it formerly accepted the pseudo-religious justifications; and it continues to submit to the present holders of power who are just as hard-hearted but rather more numerous than before.

Amy Poehler photo

“According to a new survey, 67 percent of teenagers are content or extremely happy most of the time. They're called stoners!”

Amy Poehler (1971) American actress

http://snltranscripts.jt.org/04/04oupdate.phtml
Weekend Update samples

Leo Buscaglia photo
Lois Lowry photo

“That's why they call you Seer. You see more than most.”

Source: Messenger

Kazi Nazrul Islam photo

“O heart, Ramadan has come to an end,
and the happy Eid knocks at the door for all,
Come, today give yourself away wholeheartedly,
heed the divine call.”

Kazi Nazrul Islam (1899–1976) Bengali poet

"Eid, At The End Of Fasting Of Ramadan", as translated by Mohammad Omar Farooq

Kim Jong-il photo

“Calling socialism, under which the popular masses are the masters of everything, "totalitarianism" is, ultimately, a preposterous lie which identifies the most progressive idea that reflects the demands of the popular masses with the reactionary idea of fascist rulers.”

Kim Jong-il (1941–2011) General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea

Source: "Abuses of socialism are intolerable," article in Central Committee magazine Kulloja (March 1, 1993)

Related topics