Egils Levits (1955) Latvian judge, jurist and politician
Source: Address given Assuming the Office / at the Saeima, https://www.president.lv/en/article/address-he-president-latvia-mr-egils-levits-assuming-office-saeima
1910s, Political Ideals (1917)
Egils Levits (1955) Latvian judge, jurist and politician
Source: Address given Assuming the Office / at the Saeima, https://www.president.lv/en/article/address-he-president-latvia-mr-egils-levits-assuming-office-saeima
Louis Brandeis (1856–1941) American Supreme Court Justice
“True Americanism” (1915).
Extra-judicial writings
William H. Crogman (1841–1931) American classical philologist
Source: Talks for the Times (1896), "The Importance of Correct Ideals" (1892), p. 272
Frank Chodorov (1887–1966) American libertarian thinker
Source: One is A Crowd: Reflections of An Individualist (1952), pp. 36-37
Saul D. Alinsky (1909–1972) American community organizer and writer
Source: Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals (1971), p. xxiv
Herbert Hoover (1874–1964) 31st President of the United States of America
Excerpt from a statement to the New York Tribune concerning the 1920 Presidential campaign (29 April 1920)
Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar (1891–1956) Father of republic India, champion of human rights, father of India's Constitution, polymath, revolutionary…
Political Science for Civil Services Main Examination (2010)
Kim Jong-il (1941–2011) General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea
Source: "Theory of the Immortal Social-Political Body" (1986)
Albert Einstein (1879–1955) German-born physicist and founder of the theory of relativity
1940s, Religion and Science: Irreconcilable? (1948)
Context: Science, in the immediate, produces knowledge and, indirectly, means of action. It leads to methodical action if definite goals are set up in advance. For the function of setting up goals and passing statements of value transcends its domain. While it is true that science, to the extent of its grasp of causative connections, may reach important conclusions as to the compatibility and incompatibility of goals and evaluations, the independent and fundamental definitions regarding goals and values remain beyond science's reach.
As regards religion, on the other hand, one is generally agreed that it deals with goals and evaluations and, in general, with the emotional foundation of human thinking and acting, as far as these are not predetermined by the inalterable hereditary disposition of the human species. Religion is concerned with man's attitude toward nature at large, with the establishing of ideals for the individual and communal life, and with mutual human relationship. These ideals religion attempts to attain by exerting an educational influence on tradition and through the development and promulgation of certain easily accessible thoughts and narratives (epics and myths) which are apt to influence evaluation and action along the lines of the accepted ideals.